Fox News reported Trump never said that dead US troops were 'suckers,' but the network's national security correspondent said ex-officials confirmed he did: https://www.businessinsider.com/fox...firms-trump-said-dead-us-troops-losers-2020-9
Because voting for Biden is a vote for Kamala as the next president and she's no moderate. They had their chance to name a moderate for VP but the radical left painted puppet Joe into a corner when they dictated a woman of color MUST be the VP. That narrowed the field too much. Such is the platform of the racist and sexist radical left that now runs the party. Can't support that.
Apparently, libtards are incapable of learning from the past. https://theintercept.com/2020/09/05...da-tool-using-confirmed-to-mean-its-opposite/ Journalism’s New Propaganda Tool: Using “Confirmed” to Mean its Opposite Outlets claiming to have “confirmed” Jeffrey Goldberg’s story about Trump’s troops comments are again abusing that vital term. ONE OF THE MOST HUMILIATING journalism debacles of the Trump era played out on December 8, 2017, first on CNN and then on MSNBC. The spectacle kicked off on that Friday morning at 11:00 a.m. when CNN, deploying its most melodramatic music and graphics designed to convey that a real bombshell was about to be dropped, announced that anonymous sources had provided the network with a smoking gun proving the Trump/Russia conspiracy once and for all: during the 2016 campaign, Donald Trump, Jr. had received a September 4 email with a secret encryption key that gave him advanced access to WikiLeaks’ servers containing the DNC emails which the group would subsequently release to the public ten days later. Cable news and online media spontaneously combusted, as is their wont, in shock, hysteria and awe over this proof that WikiLeaks and Trump were in cahoots. CNN has ensured that no videos of the festivities are available on YouTube for anyone to watch. That’s because the claim was completely false in its most crucial respect.
We all know that all anyone can do is confirm with the source(s). You see when it's one news saying its an anonymous source it is "fake news" and when named, then "disgruntled employee" but when the source is verified as senior, there and repeating the account by all media, this is a problem for spinning.
Sully is about to become the latest smeared with "anti-American". Quite a long chain of tweets open to see.