Same difference. She's a crackpot. https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...er-behind-michael-flynn-legal-strategy-098712 She drinks from the same well as Giuliani.
Sure, it's not done like a church raffle. _______________ Fact check: All mailed ballots — called 'absentee' and not — require voter verification https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ntee-mail-in-ballots-handled-same/5610886002/ [emphasis added] ... Verifying votes To prevent fraud, all votes have to be verified to be counted. States have different ways to do that for in-person voting, but by mail, the principal method used to detect and prevent fraud is by verifying information on the mail ballot itself, according to the Brennan Center, a nonpartisan law and policy institute. To vote by mail, voters must include personal identifying information, such as an address, birthday, driver's license number or last four digits of a Social Security number. A voter’s remaining personal information is matched against the information stored on voter rolls, such as a signature. States verify mailed ballots in different ways. For example, Alabama requires a copy of the voter’s ID to be included and either two witnesses older than 18 or a notary public must sign the envelope in addition to the voter. In Maine, a signature by the voter on the envelope is compared to the signature on the absentee ballot application. Likewise, Colorado uses bipartisan teams who compare the signature on every ballot to ones the state has on file for every registered voter.
She has good intelligence. I love how you liberals always try to discredit the messenger. You can never address what people actually say. Liberal media tactic.
This is a tactic employed by anyone pushing a narrative. Discredit and attack the source of the data, ignore trying to refute the data.
She traffics in unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. What else do you call someone of the tinfoil persuasion? This forum is a serious waste of time. You Trumpsters are all either dyed in the wool partisan hacks or fucking morons. You decide.
As opposed to discrediting the source of the votes based on nothing at all. Drum up the "reality" of election fraud based on nothing at all. Bush and gang did this with the WMDs. Many Americans are so gullible it can work.
Bush was there to finish his Dad's war, not for WMD's. That has nothing to do with what's going on. Still can't address the message.