The fundamentals is that the United States is a country founded on law & order with three distinct branches of government with defined responsibilities and powers. The SNAP program is laid out by laws passed by Congress and signed into law by previous Presidents. The funding for SNAP is defined by Congress as part of the budgetary process. The President can not unilaterally change SNAP rules and funding via Executive Orders. Nor can states modify the SNAP program beyond the constraints of the administrative power provided by federal law to them to administer the program. This is not minutia, it is fundamentally how law works in a functioning democracy.
Since I don't receive SNAP and am not impacted by any of the proposed changes -- changes which are unimplementable BTW -- then I have no grounds to be included as an impacted party in any court action. I will just sit back and laugh as the Trump administration and red states try to define what is considered to be "sugary drinks" and "junk food" with some of the largest food conglomerate companies on the face of the earth breathing down their necks. Oh, it's going to be quite a MAGA clusterf*ck.
Lol, good... don't bother to do anything at all. You must care so much about SNAP, lol. That's exactly what I want you to do. Piss your bullshit arguments into the wind because they're not worth investing any serious effort into. You may not understand how reality works, but you're part of it nonetheless.
I certainly understand how SNAP & EBT works -- you can search my previous posts on ET for a wealth of detail. As a volunteer in our local food bank, I also understand the food insecurity facing low income families and the hunger endured by children -- which is why I care about SNAP.
Good job Mother Teresa. Seriously... your efforts are appreciated. Now try growing and distributing the food on a mass scale.