Trump plans to sign EO ending birthright citizenship

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Cuddles, Oct 30, 2018.

  1. That's half of the argument.

    But the other half of the argument will swirl around the definition of "natural born."
     
    #61     Oct 30, 2018
  2. UsualName

    UsualName

    Funny thought, if Trump moves to overturn birthright citizenship then all that will left as legal US citizens are peoplenwith Native American Heritage and Elizabeth Warren would still have no chance at being the president.
     
    #62     Oct 30, 2018
  3. UsualName

    UsualName

    Right. Then we are all technically illegal. Except descendants of slaves and American Indians.
     
    #63     Oct 30, 2018
  4. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Why?
     
    #64     Oct 30, 2018
  5. Wallet

    Wallet

    Birthright Citizenship wouldn't be an issue if we had control of our borders.

    If you're here illegally why should that correlate to automatic citizenship?
     
    #65     Oct 30, 2018
    DTB2, LS1Z28 and CaptainObvious like this.
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    I believe this EO will be challenged. It will go to court where the SC is likely to overrule it after other courts halt its application.

    It does however bring this issue to the forefront that needs to be addressed by a new constitutional amendment.
     
    #66     Oct 30, 2018
  7. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    #67     Oct 30, 2018
  8. UsualName

    UsualName

    The 14th amendment grants citizenship under the condition of jurisdiction. So the question is, is the jurisdiction in question subject to the will of congress? If so, what is the will of congress?

    We know the will of congres as applies to jurisdiction via the various immigration laws, legal travel and business, educational exchanges etc. these all have the authority of congress as jurisdictional applications. So if youre here on a student visa and have a baby Congress has authorized yours and your baby’s legal jurisdiction.

    Now if you are unauthorized to be here under any congressional authority do you have negative rights? Meaning is the 14th amendment not subject to congressional authority and is simply unable to be regulated by the government.

    I think there is a case here and I would be very interested in seeing the outcome.

    For the record, I support birthright citizenship as is understood today and think this case has a low chance of Holding up even with a right wing Supreme Court but I also think there is some merit to the argument.
     
    #68     Oct 30, 2018
  9. Wallet

    Wallet

    And it may be his intent all along, to force Congress to act.
     
    #69     Oct 30, 2018
  10. Right. Tighten up the border, put some real teeth in the laws dealing with employing illegals, deport without regard to family separation problems, and the issue becomes pretty much irrelevant.
    I'm happy to see Trump continuing to challenge the status quo, bringing these issues to the forefront and demonstrate just how inept our congress really is. The establishment hates him for it, and the more they hate him, the more it shows he's the right man for the job.
     
    #70     Oct 30, 2018
    Wallet likes this.