Trump lost the popular vote because he was running a campaign to win- which unless you are special like Hillary- is based on electoral votes. Refer to the Constitution for more on this So he did not spend a lot of time campaigning in California- duh. Unfortunately, the Russians prevented Hillary from campaigning in Wisconsin - too many deplorables there. Yeh, damn Ruskies.
And that's what this charade has been about from the beginning. You know what? I'm all for it. I want to see a complete and thorough investigation of all Russian money trying to influence our government. Complete and thorough being the operative phrase. Let's take a look at everyone, every single politician or anyone associated with politics who ever had any type of financial dealing with Russia. That means you know who, and lets not stop with Russia. Any money coming from China, the Saudis, any foreign government or business. I want every congressman and senator investigated. Every governor and every state legislator. We need to see just how much influence is being bought and sold by our government. Then and only then will I give a flyin fuck what Trump has done in past business dealings. The entire system of whores that run this country are on the take and everyone knows it. Expose then all, the whole scummy lot of them, or just accept it as how our criminally corrupt system works. No cherry picking just to suit your political bias.
I'd support that,doubt we are going to get it right now though.Right now the all star team of investigators are focused on Trump.
As stated he only won The EC by 78,000 votes and Trump and the republican party has lost support since Trump has been in office.Doesn't look good for 2020.In 2016 republicans had all the enthusiasm and gave it all they had while the dems had millions of never Hillary/Bernie or bust voters who stayed home or voted for Jill stein who got a million more votes than she did in 2012.After being pumped up since 2008 the best republicans could do was lose the popular vote by 3 million and eek out PA,WI and MI by 78,000 votes against a candidate who barely campaigned in those states.In 2020 democrats will have the enthusiasm and we showed what enthusiastic democrats can do in 2008. Enthusiastic democrats vs enthusiastic republicans
Tony you are desperately grasping here. Donald Trump was probably the worst candidate possible to appeal to a broad sector of the public but the democrat brand was so terrible that your candidate could not be trump. its not about how bad trump is... its that your team lost bigly to a guy who had every thing in the world thrown at him including a large part of his party saying never trump.
The GOP had the highest primary turnout since 1980,and Trump got the most gop primary votes in history.Your side was enthusiastic.I agree Trump was probably the worst candidate possible to appeal to a broad sector of the public and thats what you are likely to have in 2020,only Trumps approval and favorbility numbers has gone down
I wouldn't say losing the popular vote by 3 million and winning The EC by 78,000 is losing bigly.2008 is a better example of losing bigly and thats what democrats will be bringing in 2020.
democrats have nothing to bring at the moment... they are establishment republicans plus more lies. even your own party says your brand sucks. you won't be winning bigly til your team goes back to siding with workers over more immigration. you won't win bigly as long as your team is owned by george soros and other banker special interests. you might win... but just like when establishment republicans win the country will still get worse. nothing for voters on either side to be all excited about.