Trump Is Punishing the WHO for China’s Deceptions

qaz · Apr 16, 2020

WHO chief behaves like a lap dog to China. Taking whatever China reports at face value without questioning and parroting China's stance(then) that international travel ban is unnecessary. Didn't criticize China for not reporting the virus earlier. Baseless allegation that Taiwan was being racist against him (likely due to Chinese pressure).

Apart from being a lap dog to China and doing a sloppy job, Dr Tedros regrets that the US is pulling the funds from WHO. Playing dumb 10/10

schizo · Apr 16, 2020

themickey said:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...p-is-punishing-the-who-for-china-s-deceptions
Politics & Policy
Trump Is Punishing the WHO for China’s Deceptions

The U.S. also wants the organization to allow Taiwan to participate.

By Eli Lake April 16, 2020, 5:45 AM GMT+8

Lines of communication are open. Photographer: Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg

It’s hard to remember a policy from President Donald Trump that has been as roundly and swiftly condemned as his decision to suspend U.S. funding for the World Health Organization.

The editor of the prestigious British medical journal the Lancet called the funding freeze a “crime against humanity.” The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said it is “not in U.S. interests.” Microsoft founder Bill Gates said it is “as dangerous as it sounds.” Congressional Democrats have called the move unconstitutional.

It’s easy to understand the outrage. In the middle of a pandemic, many poor countries rely on the WHO’s expertise and guidance. The U.S. is the largest single donor to the organization, providing about 15% of its budget. The freeze may force the WHO to curtail aid at a time when the need is greatest.

As usual, however, there is more to the story. U.S. diplomatic officials tell me that the cutoff in funding came after senior U.S. officials pleaded with WHO leaders to make good on a list of reasonable requests — and those leaders refused.

The U.S. requests included supporting Taiwan’s bid to participate in the World Health Assembly, pressing China to provide U.S. public health agencies with the complete set of early samples of the virus, and providing greater transparency into how the virus initially spread within China. Only after WHO Secretary-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declined these requests did Trump cut off of funding — in an attempt to pressure him to change his mind.

The WHO secretary-general is in a bind. The organization needs access to China and its public health system, but China imposes conditions on such access. High on the list is the exclusion of Taiwan, which has had great success in fighting the pandemic but which China considers a breakaway province, from UN organizations.

For a long time the U.S. — the WHO’s largest donor — looked the other way when China employed these strong-arm tactics. No longer. U.S. officials also tell me that they will try to mitigate the impact on public health by spending the money Trump would have sent to the WHO through the U.S. Agency for International Development and other agencies. The administration is also hoping to rely on large international charities to do this work.

So does this mean Trump was justified in cutting off the WHO funding? It depends. It’s a high-risk strategy. If Trump’s brinksmanship succeeds in getting WHO officials to force China to be more transparent, then a brief suspension of funding will do a world of good. If, on the other hand, other countries step in to make up the funding shortfall, then Trump will have isolated and embarrassed the U.S. on the world stage.

The worst-case scenario is that the cutoff in funding inhibits the ability of poor countries to slow the spread of Covid-19. A pandemic is a reminder of how connected the world really is. If the spread is slowed in America but rages in Eritrea, the risk of a new outbreak remains. And while it’s possible for the U.S. government to perform some of the roles of the WHO, U.S. government agencies are unlikely to get access to such countries as Iran or Venezuela, both of which are fighting outbreaks.

Trump is correct that the WHO has failed to perform one of its most important functions: Serving as the world’s early-warning system for new infectious diseases. But his anger is misdirected. It is China that is still not being fully transparent about the outbreak. The problem is that Trump has fewer options and less leverage with China, which is a crucial link in the medical supply chain for the U.S. and much of the world. The result is that, for the moment, the WHO is being punished for China’s deceptions.
More...

Well, forget WHO for a second. Who (no pun intended) will punish CDC for its idiotic missteps?

El OchoCinco · Apr 16, 2020

keesa said:
Trump's first and foremost request for WHO is adding Taiwan to be a WHO observant?!
More...

Pretty sure it was a dig at China...

ironchef · Apr 16, 2020

themickey said:
The WHO secretary-general is in a bind. The organization needs access to China and its public health system, but China imposes conditions on such access. High on the list is the exclusion of Taiwan, which has had great success in fighting the pandemic but which China considers a breakaway province, from UN organizations.
More...

Frankly even after agreeing to everything China wanted, WHO did not get real access and real information. He is in a bind of his own doing:

WHO accepted China's claims of only 70,000 cases and 3000 total deaths in a country with 3rd world healthcare system. WHO parroted China's position, including no human to human transmission, said no need for travel restriction, accepted China's data at face value without a single question/protest, not fought to include US CDC experts on it team to China, rejected Taiwan's data on human to human transmission out right without giving Taiwan a day in court....?

I am not a Trump fan and did not vote for him but I think he has every right to criticize WHO for not doing its job and to demand reform.

luisHK · Apr 16, 2020

ironchef · Apr 16, 2020

El OchoCinco said:
Pretty sure it was a dig at China...
More...

I have no dog in this fight but why doesn't WHO include a country that has the best success in managing the coronavirus pandemic to share their experience and approach? And WHO claimed they are apolitical.

luisHK · Apr 16, 2020

ironchef said:
I have no dog in this fight but why doesn't WHO include a country that has the best success in managing the coronavirus pandemic to share their experience and approach? And WHO claimed they are apolitical.
More...

Did u watch the video I posted above ?

El OchoCinco · Apr 16, 2020

ironchef said:
I have no dog in this fight but why doesn't WHO include a country that has the best success in managing the coronavirus pandemic to share their experience and approach? And WHO claimed they are apolitical.
More...

China has a lot of control over WHO...thus the stance that taiwan is a rebel republic and does not deserve status.

China needs to let it go and realize Taiwan handles everything better than China and should be learned from.

ironchef · Apr 16, 2020

luisHK said:
Did u watch the video I posted above ?
More...

Sorry, no. As a matter of practice, I don't click on any videos posted on ET. I am also very careful when I click on any links here unless I recognize the website.

apdxyk · Apr 16, 2020

That Wuhan Health Organisation boss is from the country they own. And the ROI there sucks, btw.