Of course they did, no surprise. Like I wrote yesterday, you cannot expect to be taken seriously when you're entire movement is based on a fraud, you acknowledge the fraud, but then use it anyway because, you know, it's what we believe to be happening anyway. Bottom line, if Trump is so horrible and the situation is so dire, then you don't need to fabricate stories to demonstrate that. When you must embellish the truth, misrepresent facts, and outright lie, just to try and make your argument stronger, you are demonstrating that your position is extremely weak to begin with. Both sides do it, but the left has taken it to a whole new level with Trump.
There is no valid defense for lies and propaganda on the Time magazine cover. Time magazine practices this yellow journalism on a regular basis.
The editor stated this, in that interview: "Well, none of us knew what had happened to this girl after this precise moment" Maybe you should have done a little, ya know, journalism and found out the girl's story before using it to paint your emotional narrative?
You're suggesting that they practice, you know, like journalistic integrity? Can't do that and push the narrative. What passed for actual journalism has been abandoned, and the left is fine with that because Trump is evil.
The scumbag who took the picture knew exactly what happened. What he told them and what they knew are good questions. Questions that you would think any Journalism 101 student would have known to ask. Obviously all they care about is trying to hurt Trump, facts be damned.
What a two-faced piece of shit Obama is. The Flores Case was brought against the Obama administration for separating/detaining children. His DOJ defended the government position before the court. Half or more of the lefty incendiary pictures of children in "cages" were from Obama's time. Okay, you knew that, but I offered up a reminder anyway. https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/i...ly-separation-border-trump-backs-down-n885041