Trump gets another TIME cover

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TRS, Jun 21, 2018.

  1. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    He would probably pull out his 10-foot comb-over and choke your ass with it.
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2018
    #101     Jun 22, 2018
  2. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    If it is then she should be charged for those crimes but that has got nothing to do with the points you made and the questions I asked. You are making claims without any proof which goes beyond the stories in both Time and DailyMail.

    I read the stories which is how I am able to call out the fake news you are peddling. Father knows they were never separated even though the mother ran away with the child against his wishes? LOL. So how does he know? Who told him? The mother? Who? Where are the specifics.
     
    #102     Jun 22, 2018
  3. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    There is no fucking way there is only one person using exGOPer's username. No fucking way. Well, the only way is if you have multiple personalities.
     
    #103     Jun 22, 2018
    CaptainObvious and Good1 like this.
  4. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    It's a deep state conspiracy, you should look under your bed. There is an entire team dedicated to reply to handful of dumbasses on some low traffic section of a trading forum. You got us.
     
    #104     Jun 22, 2018
    RRY16 likes this.
  5. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    You go from a person I wouldn't mind having an honest civil debate with to a complete irrational lunatic. Perhaps you can give me a disclaimer with each post so that I know which one I am dealing with.
     
    #105     Jun 22, 2018
    elderado likes this.
  6. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    As part of the civil debate, I asked you a very very very simple question.

    Someone told the father. He hasn't spoken to his wife to confirm, but he was told by others.

    I just want to know WHO told him, that's all. Why the fuck should I trust some disgruntled man who is miles away from where the action is? How does he know?
     
    #106     Jun 22, 2018
  7. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    The Daily Mail story says:

    Denis said that he hopes to use the photo and his family's situation to help him reunite with his daughter...

    Hernandez said that he wanted his wife and daughter to come home and that he would welcome them when they return.

    Speaking to DailyMail.com Hernandez said he has still not been in direct contact with his wife Sandra because he does not have a way of communicating ...

    The father of the Honduran girl who became the face of the family separation crisis has revealed that he still has not been in touch with his wife or daughter but was happy to learn they are safe...

    In an exclusive interview with DailyMail.com, Hernandez, who lives in Puerto Cortes, Honduras, says that he was told yesterday that his wife and child are being detained at a family residential center in Texas but are together and are doing 'fine.' ...

    Denis said his wife and daughter were never separated by border control agents and remain together.


    All that repetition and not a word about how he found out. That's Daily Mail for you.

    Then there's this:

    Couldn't the current US government get to the bottom of this? Of course they could. Where's the answer?
     
    #107     Jun 22, 2018
  8. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    Not one word? Do I have to do all the work for you?

    Is your wheel broken on your mouse?

    "But Hernandez said that he had heard through family members that his wife and daughter had not actually been separated."

    What kind of woman would abandon three children? I guess she only likes one of them. Sounds incredibly selfish to me. She is separated from 3 of her children because apparently, she doesn't care about those children.

    "The couple has three other children, son Wesly, 14, and daughters Cindy, 11, and Brianna, six."

    "He said that Yanela is the youngest of four children and she was the only one that traveled with her mother, a decision that surprised him. "
     
    #108     Jun 22, 2018
  9. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    So now we are going to debate the moral character of the women instead of the facts? This is the civil debate you promised? Who cares about this deflection? You called Time Magazine story 'fake news' based on a notorious tabloid who paid millions in damages to Melania Trump for calling her a prostitute who provide ZERO evidence for any of the claims 'Denis' made who hasn't been in contact to know any of her story but was 'told' - who told him, you have no answer for that! But let's talk about the family drama which you know nothing about either!

    Really?
     
    #109     Jun 22, 2018
  10. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    I didn't promise anything. I said I would want to have a civil debate. You have proven previously that you don't want to have a civil debate. I am more than willing.

    You said not one word. That is incorrect. You will not admit to it though.

    You went completely off topic once you were proven wrong. That is intellectually dishonest.
     
    #110     Jun 22, 2018