Sure. Look at the popular voting results. Next look at how Rasmussen reports how Democrat leaning people they asked think about the ban. From there you can deduce that they have not surveyed a mixed type of people but mostly Republican leaning ones. The first metric (popular vote) is a factually true and verified number. How Democrats think of the ban Rasmussen itself reported (34% in favor, it's in their report). So how did they get to 57% total of all respondents favoring the ban unless they asked more non Democrat leaning respondents? Sometimes math and basic statistics greatly help.
Zero terrorists who killed Americans in the US came from those countries ever. Many came from UAE and Saudi Arabia. Why are those two not on the list?
Maybe because independents are strongly in favor of the ban? It's not just Republicans and Democrats, you know, right? Sometimes an understanding of polling greatly helps.
"Additional information from this survey and a full demographic breakdown are available to Platinum Members only." Nothing is omitted. I understood it just fine.
But how Republican and Democrat leaning people voted is included in the publicly available version? That does not smell fishy?
It's pretty clear that Rasmussen is right leaning. And they were the one with the largest polling error ever among all other polling services (Hawaii) before getting the Trump election more right than others. Each time they surveyed a race where a Democrat was leading their error was larger than the one of most others https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/is-rasmussen-reports-biased/ https://www.theguardian.com/comment...up-rasmussen-polling-outliers-lean-republican https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...e-for-the-common-poll/?utm_term=.e2fc13e03064