I think someone needs to explain to right wingers what 'legitimate' rape is and what consensual sex is.
Its funny how the brain dead liberals are so scared of The Donald. Maybe someone could post a link to a thread where cons are scared of Bernie? No? Now isn't that telling?
It's really telling that these dumb liberals are afraid of a guy who is losing by 16 points in a general election match up. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html First these liberals were afraid of Sarah Palin, then Herman Mccain and then Mitt Romney. Now these dumb liberals are afraid of a guy who is losing twice as badly asany of those morons. There is a reason for this saying - Not all Cons are stupid but if you are stupid, you are likely a Con.
Desperate Conservatives Break Out The Nazi References In An Attempt To Stop Bernie Sanders By: Keith Brekhus more from Keith Brekhus Tuesday, July, 21st, 2015, 7:32 pm "An article written by Kevin D. Williamson on Monday, comparing Bernie Sanders to Nazis, marked a new low for the supposedly “respectable” conservative publication National Review. After causing a stir with his article, Williamson went on Twitter to defend his article by tweeting: "There is no intellectually honest way to get from this to “Bernie Sanders is a Nazi” "I wonder if Williamson realizes people can still read his article. In it he states: "He [Sanders] is, in fact, leading a national-socialist movement, which is a queasy and uncomfortable thing to write about a man who is the son of Jewish immigrants from Poland and whose family was murdered in the Holocaust. But there is no other way to characterize his views and his politics. "How dare us liberals accuse him of calling Sanders a Nazi, just because he used his name and the words “national-socialist” and “Holocaust” in the same sentence. After all, Williamson wasn’t saying Sanders is a Nazi, he was merely implying, that Sanders was so uncomfortably like a Nazi that the parallels made him queasy. Wow, pardon the left for jumping to conclusions, simply because Williamson threw in a gratuitous mention of the Holocaust, that really the silly liberals, should recognize wasn’t actually meant to be germane to his argument. "Later in the article, Williamson finally throws in a “he’s not really a Nazi” disclaimer by assuring the reader that Bernie Sanders is no Julius Streicher (glad that’s cleared up), because he is motivated more by “political hatred” than “racial hatred”, like a different “national socialist”, Hugo Chavez. Well, actually in Williamson’s narrative, Sanders is like an-anti Latin American Hugo Chavez, which seems a bit ironic. However, the important thing Williamson is trying to convey to the reader is that socialism and nationalism are bad, and that because Sanders argues for socialism and a form of economic nationalism, then he too is bad. "Yet, Williamson’s evidence that Sanders is a national socialist, is based primarily on the fact that Sanders promotes fair trade over free trade, and that he wants to repeal the Supreme Court’s “Citizen’s United” ruling. Oh the horror. "While opposition to free trade can include elements of parochialism and as a consequence, politicians can stoke anti-Chinese or anti-Latin American prejudices to rally white economic populist voters, there is nothing inherently racist about opposing trade deals that cede American national sovereignty (and the sovereignty of other nations) to unregulated corporate power. "Interestingly, Williamson is careful in his piece, not to mention the Citizens United ruling by name. Instead, he simply argues: "Criminalizing things is very much on Bernie’s agenda, beginning with the criminalization of political dissent. At every event he swears to introduce a constitutional amendment reversing Supreme Court decisions that affirmed the free-speech protections of people and organizations filming documentaries, organizing Web campaigns, and airing television commercials in the hopes of influencing elections or public attitudes toward public issues. That this would amount to a repeal of the First Amendment does not trouble Bernie at all. "In the context of discussing “National Socialism” and repealing the First Amendment, the rhetorical strategy is seemingly designed to conjure up fears of Bernie Sanders’ rounding up dissenters and shipping them off to concentration camps. But what Sanders is calling for is repealing Citizens United so that extremely wealthy people can’t funnel unlimited money into our elections in the hopes of influencing political candidates." More >>
I'm not defending him. Just pointing out that you're misleading folks. Trump AND you can both be idiots. It's not an either or.
Breaking News: Trump is running for President and has a campaign. The campaign represents Trump and whatever is said by any of his paid lackeys will be attributable to him. Also, what do you call a person who 'confuses' MediaMatters with Mediaite? Another idiot or habitually confused?
It's good to know that every time Biden or someone in Obama's administration makes a gaff, well that's actually Obama talking.... You're an idiot shill.
Another dumb Con with a short memory. This is from a right wing site in 2012. "Will Obama Apologize to Ann Romney Like He Did Sandra Fluke?" Just hours after DNC adviser Hilary Rosen attacked stay-at-home mother of five Ann Romney for having “never actually worked a day in her life” during an interview on CNN, the Democrats’ “war on women” narrative has been turned on its head. The Republican National Committee called on DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz to apologize for Rosen’s insulting comments. “Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should immediately apologize for the insulting and insensitive comments of her adviser, Hilary Rosen. If Obama disagrees with Rosen’s comments, he should personally call Ann Romney to apologize. http://www.lifenews.com/2012/04/12/will-obama-apologize-to-ann-romney-like-he-did-sandra-fluke/ Now go back to your bubble, Romney landslide will surely happen this time.
Another dumb Lib that can't understand the English language. There's a big difference between taking responsibility for mistakes made by appointees vs. having their words personally attributed to the official as you have done. I believe both the Trumps said their is no basis for the comment and Cohen has admitted he misspoke and has apologized. End of Story Except you and your ilk keep repeating the false narrative... Yes it's been reported all over the place because of shills like you and their fear of the Donald.
I specifically quoted The Republican National Committee callling on DNC Chair to apologize? Why? Because the spokesperson who made the Ann Romney comments represented DNC which is why the RNC correctly called on the DNC chair to apologize. In the same way, since Cohen is a paid for spokesperson of the Trump Campaign, he absolutely represents Trump and whatever he says is attributable to Trump. That's how campaigns have worked forever and it's reported all over because that's exactly how things work with campaigns. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean everyone else is a shill, it's likely you are ignorant of how campaigns operate.