3rd and final request for a list of accomplishments that support your opinion that Biden should get the vote for President.
Fred, I've read the articles you've posted and I read your examples whenever you offer them up. Please listen to the second video in this tweet. It will take you less than 1 minute to do so. If you want, you can have a further example in the first video (also very quick). Please explain how this is - in any way - prevarication or threading the needle. It is as clear as clear can be, and I would like to understand why you believe otherwise.
And Joe Biden told blacks to their faces that if they do not vote for him, they aren't black? Now, that is utterly, racist for anyone with an ounce of intelligence to comprehend. You do not need to be a genius to see that it is Joe Biden who is racist and treats blacks as his slaves in the Democrat plantation.
Why? Orangeman bad. It's all that they can see. Facts and achievements mean nothing to them. Stop trying to get these people to see the reality in front of their face. It will never be seen.
Maybe. But if there is ever going to be civil discourse between sides, it will begin when two folks of polar opposite beliefs accept that there are some things the other believes that are not "wrong".
I've spent 2 days asking them to provide ONE accomplishment of Biden's that has earned their support of him. The research team hasn't been able to offer one example, yet their love of Joe (actually it's hate of Trump) rages on.
I get it but lets not forget that people were willing to vote for anyone but Obama or anyone but Hillary the last time around. So "anyone but Trump" is an acceptable reason to vote.
No. He never condemned racism in the moment. He refused to do so. He only did it afterwards when he was widely condemned for not doing it when first asked. Those clips don't show his IMMEDIATE responses, but only the filtered ones after his handlers dealt with the fallout of his initial responses. And his condemning of David Duke in the '90s? Sure but he "didn't even know who he was" a few years ago, when FIRST asked since he started running for president. You want unfiltered? Here it is: "Stand back and stand by." STAND BY? WTF. Sorry, Tsing, no amount of lipstick will hide the fact that it's on a pig.
The world is not laughing at us , it's reality tv. Should have ended with the customary ''You're Fired.'' ‘A country in chaos’: World shocked at how far America has fallen after Trump’s ‘spiteful’ debate President Donald Trump’s performance at the first 2020 presidential debate has shocked observers across the world who are lamenting the decline and fall of the United States of America as a world power. As the Washington Post reports, even right-wing publications such as Switzerland’s Neue Zürcher Zeitung newspaper thought Trump’s performance was symbolic of something deeply wrong with American society. “Whoever is looking for an explanation for the shape the United States is currently in will find it in those 90 minutes, that should have been a political debate,” the publication wrote on Wednesday. “Instead, the tradition has degenerated into cheap reality TV. What flickered across TV screens was the image of a country in chaos. The spiteful debate mirrors a country that is no longer even capable of having a dignified discussion.” Anna Soubry, a former Conservative Party lawmaker in the United Kingdom, called the debate “truly terrible.” “Whatever our views let’s agree and promise we will never allow British politics to plummet to such a level,” she wrote on Twitter. And French newspaper Le Monde warned that Trump’s entire presidency is a warning to the rest of the world about how even traditionally stable democracies can degenerate into authoritarianism. “Four years of Trumpism have largely contributed to weakening one of the greatest democracies in the world,” an editorial in the paper declared. “It’s a lesson for everyone else.”
The first video had a clip in an interview of him being asked this question and he immediately replied with a condemnation of it. Additionally, there is another clip of him being asked in the 2016 debate the very same question and he immediately replied that he condemned it. What you're seeing in this debate was a lot of back and forth and arguing and he simply misspoke with the "stand by" comment. When you forgive one person misspeaking because he is aligned with your beliefs and condemn another because he isn't, that is bias. Pure and simple. Here is the same question, by the same moderator, in 2016. I'm sorry, Fred. I think you are not seeing this in a fair light, but highly partisan one. We're going to have to agree to disagree.