Do you know the source of your documentary? "This film was made by the main Russian government news broadcasting company, Rossiya 1." Jesus you are a moron, there is a point where spreading the enemy's lies for them gets traitorous.
I think only a bigot would assume the producers name for the film starts with BANNED DOCUMENTARY. Obviously, that is the opinion of current source that is making it available. The fact you've never heard of the film suggests it may well be banned.
Ok all the guys on the right. Is this guy yours? You are awfully quiet. Again. "This film was made by the main Russian government news broadcasting company, Rossiya 1." You don't know the source but you lap it up like cream. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia-1#Criticism
The internet. I guess you get your information from the voices in your head. Better things to do man.
In this situation I'm getting information from a well done documentary on the subject. So the "internet" is where you are getting your information?
Ok, so it looks like you really are just getting quotes from the internet, with no clue where the quote comes from, or what it refers to. It so happens it refers something else that appeared on some Russian TV channel. I'm talking about a film by Andrei Nekrasov, which is discussed in this article by investigative reporter Robert Parry: https://consortiumnews.com/2017/10/28/guardians-of-the-magnitsky-myth/ He also discusses the circumstances of its "ban", as well as the significance of Browder's mis-characterization of Magnitsky's position/profession, except when being deposed, under oath, in an adversarial situation. "This summer, Browder testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee and argued that people involved in arranging the one-time showing of Nekrasov’s documentary should be prosecuted for violating the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), which carries a five-year prison term." Meanwhile, the U.S. mainstream media helps reinforce Browder’s dubious tale by smearing anyone who dares question it as a “Moscow stooge” or a “useful idiot.” " Yet, the Times article bows to Browder as the ultimate truth-teller, including repetition of his assertion that Sergei Magnitsky was a whistleblowing “tax lawyer,” rather than one of Browder’s accountants implicated in the tax fraud. While Magnitsky’s profession may seem like a small detail, it gets to the heart of the mainstream media’s acceptance of Browder’s depiction of Magnitsky – as a crusading lawyer who died of medical neglect in a Russian prison – despite overwhelming evidence that Magnitsky was really a clever accountant caught up in the scheme. The “lawyer” falsehood – so eagerly swallowed by the Times and other mainstream outlets – also bears on Browder’s overall credibility: If he is lying about Magnitsky’s profession, why should anyone believe his other self-serving claims? As investigative reporter Lucy Komisar noted in a recent article on the case, Browder offered a different description when he testified under oath in a New York court deposition in a related federal civil case. In that adversarial setting, when Browder was asked if Magnitsky had a law degree, Browder said, “I’m not aware that he did.” When asked if Magnitsky had gone to law school, Browder answered: “No.” "
I'm not clicking on your garbage however if it is not the original Russia 1 prop-doc it will be a company like my buddy's 'production company' in Bolivia who take short material like that and made it into 2-3 hour long rambling crap for idiot conspiracy junkies (or to assist lobbyists). It will be pro-Russian propaganda through and through if you followed the money and who benefits. Only traitors watch this disinformation puke designed to seed doubt into the minds of fucking morons like yourself who are looking for something that strokes their existing bias. "While Magnitsky’s profession may seem like a small detail, it gets to the heart of the mainstream media’s acceptance of Browder’s depiction of Magnitsky – as a crusading lawyer who died of medical neglect in a Russian prison – despite overwhelming evidence that Magnitsky was really a clever accountant caught up in the scheme." For god's sake man, Magnitsky had a degree in economics and was a qualified auditor working for a law firm. Terms used in Russia for such a role are going to be different to the US/International so you get auditor, tax accountant and tax lawyer thrown about as he likely filled all roles. Hell in Colombia lawyers are called doctors though they don't hold a PhD. What makes this is more confused online is the lawyer for the Magnitsky family Nikolai Gorokhov has a "mysterious" fall from his apartment which was in the press. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/22/magnitsky-family-lawyer-reportedly-thrown-from-building.html