Trump asks Australians to help Barr

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TreeFrogTrader, Sep 30, 2019.

  1. UsualName

    UsualName

    Again, more Trumped up charges.
     
    #11     Oct 1, 2019
  2. I don't see exposing the corruption in the FBI and in Camp Clinton as an abuse of power, regardless of whether it results in indictments or no. Similarly, the lefties argue that even if Trump was not/is not indicted there was/is value and a duty to examine the background circumstances.

    I get your point though and it is not exactly a new one: Investigating Orange Man = Good. Investigating Hillary and the Swampsers = Abuse of Power.
     
    #12     Oct 1, 2019
  3. ....and Bubba was only discussing the grandchildren with Loretta............and the 33,000 deleted emails were all just about yoga classes and Chelsea's wedding.

    Keep drinking the kool-aid.

    Anyway.....investigation is still ongoing. Thank you Mr. Barr and Mr. Durham.
     
    #13     Oct 1, 2019
  4. UsualName

    UsualName

    Talk about bullshit. Crafting charges without a basis then using a political microphone to pressure the fbi to investigate is a total corruption of the institution of justice.

    As to the orange man, he had Russian operatives coming out of his ears and his public statements were criminal - clearly. That is a legitimate basis for investigation.

    As to now, Trump is facing an impeachment inquiry for statements made to foreign leaders to investigate a political opponent and the secure property of a political party (Crowdstrike is a modern vein of Watergate). This are - on their face - legitimate abuses of power and if true absolutely impeachable.
     
    #14     Oct 1, 2019
  5. UsualName

    UsualName

    Again, you have nothing. No witnesses, no evidence, nothing but allegations.
     
    #15     Oct 1, 2019
  6. Yes, and that is why the Inspector General and John Durham have been hard at work.

    Total corruption of justice in the way that Trump has been witch-hunted.
     
    #16     Oct 1, 2019
  7. So, for example, the willful destruction/bleachbitting of storage drives/whatever within days of receiving a lawful order to preserve?....no evidence, no witnesses, nothing but allegations?

    Mind you, I am just giving an example.

    MORE TO COME.
     
    #17     Oct 1, 2019
  8. UsualName

    UsualName

    More bullshit. Clinton was in no way required to preserve her emails that did not pertain to her time as Secretary of State. There was never any lawful authority for her to preserve those emails.

    You’re as lost as Trump.
     
    #18     Oct 1, 2019
  9. UsualName

    UsualName

    You’re getting pretty wild as Trump gets deeper into trouble. Durham and Horowitz aren’t going to save him.
     
    #19     Oct 1, 2019
  10. I see. So that order from the House Committee does not count.

    That's what she said too.

    And Comey said that can happen to anyone. Everyone bleachbits their storage devices when they get an order from a House Committee. It's all good.
     
    #20     Oct 1, 2019