You are confusing evidence with proof. Lots of evidence but no proof yet Dont forget in court you dont need proof to convict only evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
Even as outlined by fellow Republicans, the Comer committee has lots of allegations not backed by a shred of evidence. It is a waste of tax-payer money.
There's a bit of an epidemic of people who think if they keep making the same narrow focus points ignoring the big picture they are achieving something.
House Republican Tells Fox News There’s ‘Little to No Evidence’ Supporting Key Theory Behind Biden Impeachment "The theory, I guess, is Burisma paid money to Hunter Biden so Joe Joe Biden would fire Shokin because Shokin was investigating Burisma,” Buck said. “One, there is little to no evidence he was investigating Burisma. Two, Shokin was targeted by the European Union as well as our State Department to be fired he was more corrupt than the people he was investigating. And three, there is very little evidence to no evidence that suggests Hunter Biden shared the money he got with Joe Biden so that Joe Biden would do something or that Joe Biden knew Hunter Biden was getting money so that Joe Biden would take these acts.”" https://www.mediaite.com/news/house...pporting-key-theory-behind-biden-impeachment/
Some days it's amusing, some days I connect the dots to the same type of people who were robotic enough to cause the Cambodian and Rwandan genocides and he is less funny.
It will be easier to point out the correct item. Here it is-- Burisma paid money to Hunter Biden so Joe Biden would fire Shokin because Shokin was investigating Burisma