So you're saying every newspaper in this or any other country throughout history that endorsed a candidate has had a bias?
Since the days of George Washington.... I mean the editorial staff will endorse a presidential candidate in line with their political leanings because editors choose what stories run and the slant they take. Wapo has endorsed Dems since Jimmy Carter and not surprising political coverage leans left.
More exclamation, you should be more shush like Epstein. When asked if he "ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18" Epstein replied, "Though I'd like to answer that question, at least today I'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and 14th Amendment right, sir."
So the NYTimes reporting Chinese attempts to hack Trump/Vance and his gaining in the polls, etc etc means they support Trump/Vance?
Not sure what tangent you are swerving to but when the editorial board endorses a presidential candidate it indicates an implicit bias in how they cover politics. You think CNN has a dem bias but WaPo.doesnt? Compare.WaPo to Wahington Times...
Never said either one didn't have some bias. But if the NYTimes reports Don The Con has slight edge in (IMO meaningless) polls and betting markets and also reports of Chinese hacking attempts which are favorable news stories to him that is not the same as say MSNBC 24x7 complete negative coverage. There is bias and there is BIAS. Anyway as many have said endorsements for national office is longer a thing.