Tribute to Brooks

Discussion in 'Journals' started by padutrader, Jan 26, 2021.

  1. padutrader

    padutrader

    brooks gives fantastic things but THE BOOK WAS WRITTEN FOR THE EXPERIENCED TRADER ,check the preface the introduction

    the vids are for beginners
     
    #1371     Nov 2, 2021
  2. padutrader

    padutrader

    you cannot blame brooks

    if you want to teach a wannabe trader what would you teach first?

    if you want to teach someone who is losing for 5 years what would you teach him first.

    this brooks has not addressed.

    but that does not mean what he says is rubbish
     
    #1372     Nov 2, 2021
  3. padutrader

    padutrader

    it means i was profitable for the last few days.

    and where is it written that you have to be profitable for 20 days or 59 days 0r 400 days-what is the figure?- before you can call yourself a profitable trader.

    prove that i am a losing trader.

    prove that i even trade

    you only know i am losing because i posted that here. you believed me!

    now i have posted that i am profitable and you disbelieve me.....so who is nuts
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2021
    #1373     Nov 2, 2021
  4. p0box4

    p0box4

    I believe you are a losing trader since all the evidence points that way, all the signals you have published on the MQL website all blew up, so until you can prove otherwise, you are not a profitable trader.

    Now you don't have to prove anything, but you cannot really expect people to believe you all of a sudden are profitable, after claiming that at least 100 times while it wasn't true.

    To answer your question: what is the figure? I would say:

    1: Once you have made back all the money you have lost in the past AND
    2: At least 6 months of consistent profit without mayor draw down swings the be sure a blow out isn't going to happen any time soon.

    So no, i didn't believe you when you posted you were losing, i believed the statistics i had access to. So no, i wont believe you are profitable all of a sudden unless you can prove otherwise, with statistics. If you don't want to, fine by me, but you have proven countless times in the past that your word is worthless, so without proof i guess it just isn't true :).
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2021
    #1374     Nov 2, 2021
  5. padutrader

    padutrader

    i am now
     
    #1375     Nov 2, 2021
  6. padutrader

    padutrader

    why? where is it written?

    is what you say the law? do you decide
     
    #1376     Nov 2, 2021
  7. padutrader

    padutrader

    I GAVE YOU THOSE FUCKING STATS

    NOW I AM SAYING I AM PROFITABLE...I WILL PRODUCE STATS TAHT SAY SO:

    I WILL LINK ANOTHER ACCOUNT TAHT SHOWS I AM PROFITABLE
     
    #1377     Nov 2, 2021
  8. p0box4

    p0box4

    Great.
     
    #1378     Nov 2, 2021
    Laissez Faire likes this.
  9. p0box4

    p0box4

    Lol, how can you say you are profitable while your net return is still negative :banghead:.
     
    #1379     Nov 2, 2021
  10. NumberZ

    NumberZ

    You say that as if a beginner is a bad thing.

    I think he book was written for the trash.

    Are you experienced. Or have you spent 15 years "beginning".
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2021
    #1380     Nov 2, 2021