He isn't facing anything. He has no travel restrictions. Given that a lynch mod is forming it is safe for him to assume that he will receive no justice and he should flee immedietely.
Can you outline the events as you believe them to be based on the 911 calls, media accounts including witness, tape from Martin's lawyer speaking about the cell phone call then. This is my best explanation based on all of this information. This is a good time for you to list out your 'facts' in the same way that a lawyer would for court then. I would ask that you listen to all of the 911 calls first, the tape from Martin's lawyer of the girlfriends account, and read the account of the 911 caller #4 (who you called the 'secret witness') that appeared in local papers (in no place did this eyewitness ever say he saw who started the confrontation).
LOL Not exactly. You made this up. Show me where the evidence for this statement is. For arguments sake let's assume Zimmerman asked him what he is doing here. What's the 911 tape show? The only witness is Zimmerman. If he says he didn't start it you have to believe him unless you have PROOF or a WITNESS that he didn't. You have to have proof for this point or there is no case that this was murder of any type. 8) Zimmerman is not charged as the facts available indicate he acted in SELF-DEFENSE. Unless you can find a witness saying he saw Zimmerman throw the first punch - End of story.
He can join the long list of child molesters, financial scam artists, rapists, and murderers living overseas.
So the moral of the story is that as long as I kill everyone that saw me murder someone including the initial victim, then my explanation of events automatically stands with police and will never be questioned. Sounds like a license to gun down whoever I want. BTW this is why criminal law teaches the need for independent witnesses for criminal cases and car accident reports. Take a car accident, each party involved in the accident normally gives an explanation that the other party is at fault and they are guiltless in the collision. In regards to 8, the police investigation is not complete. The local police and DA have admitted to totally blotching the investigation and have been removed. Now competent authorities are driving the investigation, the results will be placed in front of a grand jury. The grand jury is the first step in detemining if he acted in self-defense. End of story. You already confirmed that you do not want this case to follow the usual legal process under the law - but you are jumping the gun in attempting to state "Zimmerman is not charged".
He isn't charged with anything so he would not be a fugitive. The Black Panthers offered a bounty today for the "capture" of Zimmerman. He has every reason to take off. New documents can be obtained in Los Angeles at Alvarado and 8th St. If he speaks spanish then Spain would be an obvious choice but South America might be even better. Start a new life and let America wallow in its racist self-hatred. I would never let myself become a pawn in a ideological battle between political factions. He should disappear. He might even be able to become a cop in Chile or Argentina.
Unless an eye witness to the physical altercation comes forward, it's impossible to know what happened. It's possible Zimmerman initiated and Martin acted in self-defense. It's possible, Martin attacked first and was killed, because of it. Aficat, nobody knows. Here's a question: Why does the media obsess over one bi-racial murder (crying racism) but ignore the hundreds of black-on-black murders that are commonplace, every month?
That's pretty much right. If the evidence does not prove your story is false but corroborates what you say, your story is believed to be true unless sufficient other FACTS can be found that don't support it. You have to have proof before you can charge and try someone of a crime - especially a serious crime such as murder. Or you have to have a compelling circumstantial case like with Casey Anthony. Still, that didn't work out for the prosecution. The police chief was not removed. He stepped aside temporarily to quell the likes of Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton from turning the event into a riot. If there is more investigation of the scene and interviewing witnesses, that's fine. If they can find more witnesses, good. And, if they do and the facts change, then so be it. But, if the prosecutor's office can't find sufficient evidence to support a crime then I doubt a grand jury looking at the same facts will come to a different conclusion. It would just be a waste of taxpayer money.
The eyewitness and Zimmerman both told police that Martin attacked Zimmerman who was walking towards his truck which is why he was released. Do you think the cops would release Zimmerman if they thought he started a fight with Martin and then shot Martin?
Who was the eyewitness? I thought Zimmerman was the only witness, and his injuries and the 911 call corroborated, so they let him go.