Show respect for someone that crashes a site he has already been banned from . . . yea right. You deserve nothing . . . exactly what you are worth.
So you or your butt brother Equaltoothless trade me online for a week. That would be an easy way to show that I'm a bullshitter, right? Oh that would embarrass you cause you nor Toothless can trade . . . Oh, check your email.
Why is it that when I hear "FrothLogic" I think of the words "Pathological Liar, Charlatan, Clown, Fraud, Crook, BS artist..."? I wonder?
Another common-sense question: Why would someone who was successfully trading begrudge the modest amount of money required to be an ET sponsor? Why spend a lot of time and energy threading the needle around the terms-of-service -- avoiding linking to promotional site(s), etc? Why not come out of the closet -- hey, I'm a proud sponsor of ET, and here are the products I offer...?
And a common sense answer. Vendors benefit from sponsorship. This is a great site and cost effective for them. I'm not selling anything here so why do I need to be a sponsor?
Common sense question: If my method is vague and can't be tested objectively, why is David Goodboy aka Marketsurfer aka chefboyamihngry aka (20 other banned aliases) here repeatedly (for over 5 years) refused to test it or to trade with me heads up. I've given him every opportunity to test it and he's aways come up with one lame excuse or another. Answer he's scared to death that if he tests it that he and all of the other asshole buddies that condemned it would have to eat their words. What better way to PROVE I'm a fake but trade me and watch my signals or test my method but that will never happen. Davy boy here and his group of miscreants don't have the balls between them to step up to the plate to make that happen. I've sent my stuff for free to individuals that have asked and not a single one has ever come back and said that what I gave them DIDN'T help then trade better. That in itself pisses the shit out of the likes of Equaltoothless and Goodboy and his hedge fund huckering crowd.
It's quite funny to criticize a nobel prize nominee, especially one with a system I've found to be a top 10 S&P system easily at futurestruth.com, and that's just my version. If you would like to think about why he wouldn't post the code here, you might find it a tad more logical to think about why he would. The answer is he wouldn't, which doesn't get anymore obvious nor does it require a philosophical debate about logic.
This is a typical reaction related to skepticism. It is actually quite offensive to insinuate such derogatory aspersions about the character of someone you'll never be priveleged enough to ever get to see his end product, even though he has posted charts of his software.
Should be out in several weeks, after it is incubated, but you or anyone else won't ever get to see the code, and futurestruth can't view it either. You can just see the results, but bear in mind my lame interpretation still beats everything out there and I've seen his actual system perform solidly well for many months. I think the funniest part in the book he wrote is the warning: <b><i>This method is not for the novice investor.</b></i> I guess it would only be funny to someone that knows how hard algorithmic strategy trading is, and doesn't request an accomplished trader to disclose his strategies. As to why, I said, he will say, and he has said to me, <b><i>"For obvious reasons."