You are an author and journalist. To earn our respect why not post facts instead of just your opinions and interviews of others voicing their opinions? Maestro's credentials are open information for those that want to look for it on this site. Go interview him and get the facts instead of flaming him without merit.
If real people with real names want to be non-anonymous, ok. If someone wants me to see a link, post it. No time for scavenger hunts.
No, it's not on his posts here or on his profile. I'm not going to search through nearly 2,000 of his posts to find it. I'll leave that to you Kool-Aid drinkers. Either post it or quit making unsubstantiated claims. Just curious, is the mantra you said earlier something you recite 100 times at your cult meetings: "Maestro, you are a master quant, you are a master trader, you are an investor's investor, you walk the walk and talk the talk. You can back up all of your opinions with cold hard facts."
This thread http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=65182 references a site www.MarketGuidance.com that's no longer in service (thought there are traces on WayBack http://web.archive.org/web/20061205015855/http://marketguidance.com/) -- but the thread is others' comments, not his own, so I have no idea if the affiliation ascribed to him is correct.
http://www.qatinc.com/index.php Here is the link for those of you that are "search" & technically challenged. God forbid you put forth some effort to check something out. Simpler just to flame, right? Kool-Aid drinkers? So those of us that attended college, comprehend higher math and can read and understand things like this: http://online.redwoods.cc.ca.us/ins...skymeg/proj.pdf are Kool-Aid drinkers huh? When did simply becoming "informed", educated and have a hunger for information be a negative? Good luck "following" someone that can't define his own area of expertise.
From WayBack, 2006 -- http://web.archive.org/web/20061010014231/http://marketguidance.com/directors_and_officers.html http://web.archive.org/web/20061004220126/http://marketguidance.com/market_guidance_fund.html Can anyone -- perhaps investors in, or customers of, `Market Guidance' -- shed further light?
I would appreciate any hard data you have debunking this method. I check out stuff from time to time and was about to begin tearing into it. I'm not interested in anything other than hard data though. I've been watching a friend test it and from what I see it is fully mechanical and objective.