Any serious professional knows what an absolute joke this comment is. Some of the most successful funds that trade forex and commodities are trend following. Trend/counter-trend, BOTH work. You are acting like the typical ET bird-brain who just figured out the realm of counter-trend trading after failing to employ a successful trend strategy, thus now de-facto conclude trend is counter-"intuitive." If/when a newb is fortunate enough to make it around the block, they will realize what an entirely circle-jerk argument this thread represents.
that's not true. 2008 our option arb fund up over 60%, smaller option marketmaking vol/arb fund up over 300% prior to rule change in late summer--can't get into details. what's the difference between "trend following" and buy/sell and hold?? thanks, surf
There's nothing "hedge" about it. It's marketed as a managed futures fund, and the founders use a trend-following indicator to follow trends in a diversity of futures markets. rt
Asked and answered; over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over . . . again. You simply don't like some of the answers so you ignore them. Great political tactic.
yes, i agree with you, except for the final statement---i would change it to read "succesful trading must encompass more information than charts can provide" surf