Didn't change, became more efficient and easier to validate. How has your "trend Following" evolved to progress with technology in the last 15 years?
Right now you seem to be making it up that you wrote a book and were nominated for Nobel Prize. Are you making both of those claims up?
What year did technology advances allow you to become more 'efficient'? Or are you saying that every RAM/processor advance makes your method more profitable?
Am I? Many on here know about the book . . . I guess you enjoy living in the dark. How has your "trend following" evolved to progress with technology in the last 15 years? Too tough a question for you Mikey?
Each year technology advances, computer environments become more efficient. HFT was science fiction 15 years ago, does that mean 15 years ago if the technology DID exist to make it work, it would have still been laughed at? The formulas for HFT could have easily existed 15 years ago but the technology to make it efficient didn't. How has your "trend following" evolved to progress with technology in the last 15 years? What's so tough about this question Mikey?
Go ahead and admit that you made up this Nobel Prize claim. You did make it up? Let's start there. It will probably be a relief for you to come clean.
Sorry, I didn't. How has your "trend following" evolved to progress with technology in the last 15 years? What's so tough about this question Mikey? This is the cover-up, right Mikey? There is no evolution. I catch you in one so you try to turn the tables telling me I lied. You are true to your class. Calling it a night playing with the unarmed. Some of us have families. If I'm bored, I'll play tomorrow.