Why the secret dialect? Why not just post the entry prior to the fact in plain english? Must be all left brain types who like the pictures..... TINS
Check in with your "quant" at your "firm", he will give you a print of the code he did and how the trades print from today on in whatever market you both decide to trade. You have an ATS for my trades already; read its prints. Here you see a YM 2 minute chart being managed. I usually comment on the ES 5 minute which is lead by the YM 2 minute. Minor point, ask around in your firm about how orders to the market work. Your prior comments under various aliases indicate you are not familiar with trading platforms. I do not do entries prior to the fact. I do hold-reversal trading. This is a timing oriented type paradigm. Hold-reversal trading is a context where the market is telling me the precise timing at the time of the trade. As those who get my emails knew this am at open the entry began by climbing aboard on the "right" side of the market and holding until the first reversal. As you have informed your quant, I was taking a reversal on each step of the task sheet he is carrying out for you to automate this paradigm which your "firm" can use in any market with sufficient liqudity ALL the time during RTH. You can trade 24/7 as the globe turns and market after market does RTH. Call up Raschke or Neiderhofer and have either of them explain to your "Quant" what a set of coordinates is and what a "loop" is. Get a protractor and draw arcs from point 1 over and over and bigger and bigger to see the "maximum" if you do not know how to search a geometric code book. Think of it as a new version of a more accurate creation than those stupid horizontal fibs. Call them "dave's super global variable fibs"; you be famous in a Week. Maybe your "quant" knows what a global variable is.....lol.... The ball is in your dumbed down court.
this is a real chart snippet of the open today on the es. having the gap removed on the open is very useful. you can really see where the es left off and what is being built. today opening es with gap removed. you can see how orderly it is. picking up where bar 81 ended previous session and seamlessly continuing bar 1 today is really neat.
So we apply "dave's global variable fibs" to this degapped pattern of three moves. "Globfibs" only apply after the thread move 3 begins and points 1, 2 and 3 are in. How many points from the open were "called" by dave's "firm's" "quant"? Was it more than 25 bucks? Lets say a person has 50K and he hired Traderzones to tell him how many contracts to trade. 2, maybe, because money management is critical and that means do not trade with much capital. The quant has a backup with a protractor. He knows to make bigger circles with it from point 1 but only after the third move begins (after point 3 only). There ia a 2 contract reversal on the last bar showing. The tension begins and more unrealized profits occur. point 1 is in soon. We are looking for point 2. Then we look for point 3. It hits and the protractor is whipped out and scribing larger and larger circles begins. Will this trade net the "firm" as much as trade one did? Find out as the chart gets to the next ATS coded FTT done by the "quant" with the protractor at dave's "firm". Stay tuned. See Dave arc. Arc, Dave arc. The new Dave's global variable fib Protractor is pro tracting. Arc, Dave arc. How many trades will be arc'ed in (Globfibb'ed) for today? When will dave's "quant" at dave's "firm" start calling trades. When will Dave's "firm" begin to make salaries by trading?
I request actual entries in plain english and am responded via pychobabble and some type of secret society type code. Apparently, some people are attracted to the mystery and confusion. That's not my game. Best, TINS
Jack's been playing pied piper to the naive on the internet for over a decade... clarity would ruin his game.
I was helped elsewhere to finally come to terms with rather painfull realization - it wasn't my sloppiness in annotations. It was my sloppiness in critical thinking. The context, which I should call, for the sake of politeness, more or less a 'heuristic' concept, is not binary and as such, being the only solution to the problem of certainty/uncertainty, leads to the problem of dissapearing VE's and point 1's and 3's etc. Turns out the differentiation is a piece of fucking cake - it's not being able to determine the similarities that is the pain in the ass.
Exactly... only sloppy critical thinking would lead one to believe it's a good idea to study Jack's "teachings." But your critical thinking is even sloppier now given that you haven't seen through the facade yet given all your exposure.
Undoubtedly, for a brighter and less burdened mind one look would suffice to recognize the "Procrustean solution". I like reading bighog's posts - he certainly sounds like a guy who's been in the line of fire.
Has it ever occurred to you that Jack's "methods" are Procrustean solutions? (which is why they don't work)