trend following delusion shattered

Discussion in 'Trading' started by hank rollins, Mar 15, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Vishnu

    Vishnu

    I have no problem saying it. Trend following can be done intraday. I said it. But it has nothing to do with what the "trend followers" do that everyone seems to revere here. Its two completely different methods that have nothing to do with each other.
     
    #1801     Jan 3, 2007
  2. bighog

    bighog Guest

    Ok, in your use of the TREND FOLLOWING usage relative to what others are sayinh "in here" i concede we are on the same page. .... :D

    Thks for the feed back. DONE. Good trading to ya.
     
    #1802     Jan 3, 2007
  3. Thanks. I am reading MAR and find no reference to Formula under FoF or any other fund category.
     
    #1803     Jan 3, 2007
  4. He's wrong and just isn't aware of it yet.
     
    #1804     Jan 3, 2007
  5. Three sequential primary oscillations objectively defined in a non-varying price interval environment. The slower (more volume per bar) the chart interval the clearer the trading oscillations within that defined Trend and the less noise is created from minor oscillations.
     
    #1805     Jan 3, 2007
  6. Trends exist on any chart in any time or volume increment. One just needs to objectively define the strict non-varying parameters that form it.
     
    #1806     Jan 3, 2007
  7. And if it doesn't work consistently, tear it apart and rebuild it.
     
    #1807     Jan 3, 2007
  8. And ProfLogic keeps bringing the thread back to center . . . :)
     
    #1808     Jan 3, 2007
  9. I see you whined to the mods to have my reply removed, Hoodoo. The word is libelous. I realize you didn't receive a classical education, but c'mon. They do readin' and writin' in Pittsburgh, no? I'd thought you'd be intimately familiar with the word.
     
    #1809     Jan 3, 2007
  10. March eWheat pulling back from a Confirmed Prime Trend Resistance top to challenge and create Prime Trending Support.
     
    #1810     Jan 3, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.