Eyewitness account on Anderson Cooper. The end of the interview confirms once again that the struggle did not occur on the sidewalk but on the grass. http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_t2#/video/us/2012/03/30/ac-bts-eyewitness-martin-killing.cnn (link fixed)
Can you post the link to whatever you are trying to link to again, the link you have posted is just a link to reply to the thread, you must have copied and pasted the wrong thing by accident. Also this story is starting to turn into the same kind of shit that you see with 911 conspiracy theorists, where people are now starting to throw out any inconsistency they can find, and when it is all put together it doesnt make any sense. On Sharptons show tonight he was trying to make the claim that the incident couldnt have occured on grass, as the police report claimed, because you couldnt see grass stains, or "wet spots" on the guys dark shirt as the police report claimed. As if grass stains would have been visible on a dark shirt on a shitty camera. Now the claim is that it had to have occured on the grass, cause of a witness testimony, so it has to be one or the other. People are now playing both sides of the fence. We already know that the guy had a cut on the BACK of his head, so if the whole thing occured on the grass, and not the sidewalk, it would seem to support the idea that zimmerman was jumped from behind, because there is no way that a guys head gets busted open from banging his head against the grass. So if the thing occured on the grass and not the sidewalk, it would actually be much worse for the prosecution. You see where this is going? There is now so many different theories out there that one theory is contradicting the other one. And this is the way it works when so many people are so heavily focused on taking a story based on any minor detail they see. If this was being tried in court and not on T.V. there would be one definitive direction that the prosecution would go in where the story would be consistent, not a bunch of random shit on every minor detail where one story contradicts the next one.
Zimmerman's brother Robert on Piers Morgan (CNN) - two clips http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/be...an-robert-zimmerman-george-zimmermans-gun.cnn http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/03/30/piers-morgan-robert-zimmerman-death-threats.cnn
Thx.... The other inconsistency in the way the media is portraying that you now have people going in 2 different ways on the police report. One group is saying that the police are falsifying and doctoring the evidence. And the other side is saying that Zimmerman should be charged because a cop wanted to charged him originally, but the district attorney didnt think that there was enough evidence. Why would the cops intentionally falsify evidence, if they wanted to charge the guy? It doesnt make any sense, and its just starting to become a big circle jerk.
Interesting article on the part time mayor of Sanford http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/30/usa-florida-shooting-mayor-idUSL2E8ET3O920120330 It is interesting to note that the mayor initially did not pay much attention to the case because it was not even brought to his attention until March 10th. A slender, fair man from southwest Missouri, the mayor was in Tampa, Florida, with his family for his 11-year-old son's football game on March 10 when Sanford City Manager Norton Bonaparte Jr. called to say a shooting that had occurred 13 days earlier in their town was in the news.
Onlooker Casts Doubt On Martin's Killer's Claims All of the eyewitness testimony is falling apart as it is coming out that the police told the witnesses what they saw... Further doubt emerged Thursday over the circumstances of Florida teen Trayvon Martin's murder, as the mother of a young witness said her son was "pressured" by police and another onlooker cast doubt on killer George Zimmerman's claims. An unnamed witness speaking on CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360" said the entirety of the scuffle he saw between the two took place on grass, challenging Zimmerman's claim that Martin had smashed his head against a sidewalk after punching him in the face -- causing him to shoot the 17-year-old dead in self-defense. In reference to the size difference between 28-year-old Zimmerman and Martin, the witness described the fight as being between a "larger man" and a "boy." While the witness said he was not able to see who was on top of the other as the two scuffled, he said "there wasn't a lot of movement" immediately before he heard a gunshot. Zimmerman "didn't appear hurt" as he walked away, he added, and he didn't see any blood on him. Meanwhile, the mother of a 13-year-old who also witnessed the killing told the New York Daily News that when Sanford police interviewed her son eight days after the incident, they "pressured" him to give more detail than he recalled. The youngster, Austin Brown, had been referenced by police as having seen Martin on top of Zimmerman during the fight, but his mother, Cheryl, said he saw only one person lying on the grass and could not identify them. "He kept telling them he couldn't see anything because it was too dark," she said. "He said he couldn't see the race or anything. He never saw a second person. "Then they asked him if he saw what the man was wearing. They gave him a multiple choice question and gave him three colors. He said, 'I think it was red.' Knowing my son, I believe he felt pressured to give the color."
You are the equivalent to the hooded KKK members who lynched blacks from trees and burned crosses in the front yards of blacks. You will do anything and say anything to see this man lynched and you don't possess a shred of moral or intellectual honesty.
The CNN article from today with links to all sorts of video clips on CNN today and earlier articles on the case. http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/29/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html
Are you having medication issues today? The only thing that I have ever stated is that I believe a proper police investigation needs to be performed and a competent prosecutor needs to drive the legal side of the case to a grand jury hearing (if appropriate). We will allow others reading this thread to determine who possesses 'a shred of moral or intellectual honesty'.