Trading Math - Part I

No, thats why probability is a real assumption, I am pretty sure you said "amount" of gain/loss, not "with different assumptions".

 

I gave an example when you asked for the math. The example had stated assumptions (different gains and loss levels for wins and losses). Then you started about expectations being crap (who's doing any estimation? we are just using an illustrative example).

I gave assumptions for every value there (including gain loss levels).

It's a freaking example.

 

I would think that' target,stop' is clearer English rather than 'amount' which is like no. of win, losses.

 

I want the other side of Jack's trades.

 

nothing more horrifying than a trader with bad shoes

 

This is the forum my mother warned me about!

 

Aren't you tired of pollutign threads with this non-sense? Go play with your organs - if you have any - elsewhere please

 

Now we really attracted a looney toon.

 

Maybe not the whole forum, but this thread is precisely the train wreck I predicted it would be.

 

Sure...with idiots like you who got nothing to contribute except evidence of their psychosis.

Actually, if you could pay attention to what DontMissTheBus wrote and had the capacity to understand it you could benefit. But psychosis plus lack of understanding does not let you.