Trading Journal - May

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Seanote, May 1, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bro Seanote,

    Technically PALM could rebound after today (base on vol. climax). Fundamentally PALM will heel tough competition. I was in SF this Mar and happened to go by the Apple's Dev. Conf. (didn't attend - just looksee in the lobby). They sold out the Sharp Zaurus PDA for $ 200. I think I have seem the light then. see

    URL: http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8728350077.html

    PALM will have a tough time in the future with LinuxDevice coming up close on its tail.

    Good trading.


    Cyberslam
     
    #241     May 28, 2002
  2. Seanote

    Seanote Guest

    When I first opened the PALM trade I stated up front that this would be a long term hold. It was more of an "investment" in comparison to my swing/daytrading. As I look back on the reasons why I took the trade I wouldn't do anything differently. I used some TA but more fundamentals and potential then anything else. Once in a while a will "stray" away from my normal game plan like the PALM play, going long SOX options, and increasing my share size to 3K - 5K vs. 2K. Since I'm up on the month and year that has enabled me to take a few trades that carry more risk than my normal game plan but gives me more flexibility.
    As you mentioned earlier I have stepped up my daytrading over the last few days and all but eliminated swing trading temporarily. Some traders will disagree with me but I fully believe you must have certain trading strategies for certain markets. If you have one strategy/game plan that you stick to regardless of market conditions you will loose more times than not when it's all said in done. With the terrorist's threats and current market conditions I absolutely will not take home any positions overnight unless I'm short and I'm still very cautious about that. I have a lot of confidence in my daytrading skills and did well DT in the past but I started to enjoy swing trading more because it took less time to follow, reduced stress level and lower commissions. I've had a great time DT the last few days and have been somewhat rejuvenated with one of my old game plans and hope that these market conditions stay like they are for a while so I can keep DT.
    I plan on increasing my normal share size to 2,500 or 3,000 soon depending on liquidity. I can guarantee you that trading KLAC and QLGC with those share sizes will take a significant cut from my profits so I will probably avoid the increased share size on those stocks. Trading QLGC and especially KLAC the last few days has been very exciting. I've been able to zone in on this stock with a few TA indicators but mostly watching L2 and intraday charts. I'm KLAC will pull a 180 on me tomorrow after this comment but I feel like I'm one step ahead of the MMs with my executions and am there just before the gaps hit. I've mostly gone short but I'm considering going long while I cover my short. If I would have done that each time I closed my short the last few days I would have made that much more. The one thing with KLAC and QLGC is the volatility so you have to be able to have staying power if the trade reverses .25 soon after you take the trade. That's what the MMs are thriving and where they're making all there money. I've been down as much as .45 on a DT with those 2 stocks and ended up making .40 because I stayed and waited out the MMs. If you're looking for .15 or .20 soon after you take the trade then these are not the stocks to trade because the bid/ask will gap that much in 10 seconds and you'll get whipsawed out. Good luck!
     
    #242     May 29, 2002
  3. Seanote

    Seanote Guest

    I totally agree with your assesment about the company fundamentally, but I have seen so many traders hold out for the rebound because the business plan was so strong but the market doesn't always follow logic. I think it's a great buy now if you can hold long term. It's a different story when you're long 10K shares and the stock is setting 52 week lows. I know PALM sees this and will more than likely issue some type of positive press release to generate interest again but I'm cutting my losses and moving on.
     
    #243     May 29, 2002
  4. Hi Seanote:

    I agree w. you re. cutting loss on PALM. I would have done
    the same when carrying a 10K position. In the past I just walked away but felt that a true Pro would forget and re-evaluate the situation if a turnaround is confirmed.

    In futures trading, there's such a higher art as SAR (stop and reverse) - took me years even just to put it in the practice (easy to say then done), never mind work to perfection. PALM only qualifies for a day trade in any case.

    I like your style and echo your intent re. the needs for swing trades - it also generates the biggest winner for me too. Day trading is a slow but positive grind. Both have their places. "Plunge" is also a much needed technique - like today's last hour - you need all the leverage you can get to go long, Bro.

    Best of trading to ya.


    Cyberslam
     
    #244     May 29, 2002
  5. Magna

    Magna Administrator

    I agree with you Seanote, caution's a real good idea even for shorts. After all, what if certain al Qaeda or Taliban leaders are captured or killed during market close? Euphoric gap-up the next day, killing shorts....
     
    #245     May 29, 2002
  6. Seanote

    Seanote Guest

    Long 2,000 KLAC @ 52.52 (intra)
     
    #246     May 29, 2002
  7. Seanote

    Seanote Guest

    Closed 2,000 KLAC @ 52.80


    + .28 points
     
    #247     May 29, 2002
  8. Seanote

    Seanote Guest

    Short 2,000 KLAC @ 53.00
     
    #248     May 29, 2002
  9. Seanote

    Seanote Guest

    Covered 2,000 KLAC @ 52.59


    + .41 points
     
    #249     May 29, 2002
  10. Seanote

    Seanote Guest

    Long 2,000 QLGC @ 46.68
     
    #250     May 29, 2002
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.