Trading is Gambling. You know it! Be honest

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by ElectricSavant, Nov 19, 2006.

Gambling?

  1. Yes

    19 vote(s)
    45.2%
  2. no, I am lieng to myself

    23 vote(s)
    54.8%
  1. Clearly there is BIG difference between casinos and players.

    Casinos are capital-intensive and mathematics/statistics-based businesses, whereas players merely gamblers. :D
     
    #51     Nov 19, 2006
  2. Actually the players that try to run their business the way we do get banned for counting cards etc... only the casino is allowed to have probability on it's side
     
    #52     Nov 19, 2006
  3. That's exactly the point Electric is making with these threads. The trader can be the capital-intensive and mathematically/statistically-based business even more so than the casino.

    JJ

    P.S. I was going to say that the individual trader has the advantage of being able to pick-their spots and the casino does not, but that is not quite true, they have a million ways of keeping the odds overwhelmingly in their favor, not the least of which is managing good gamblers :eek: .
     
    #53     Nov 19, 2006
  4. Yeah, that's one of the things that I was referring to.

    But players (and casinos) are very creative, and to combat card counters one of the many tools that a casino uses are multiple-deck card shufflers, so it's not like it was in the good 'ol days.

    But by that same token, gamblers/hustlers are much more creative in their game playing as well.

    JJ
     
    #54     Nov 19, 2006
  5. This's exactly the point I am making with those words. A trader can trade like either a casino-owner or a casino-player. :)
     
    #55     Nov 19, 2006
  6. Is driving to and from work gambling? Would you be betting your life on each trip? Lifetime odds of being killed in a vehicle are 1 in 84. Sounds like a very risky bet.

    Can you make the odds more in your favor? Like quit your miserable job and trade instead?
     
    #56     Nov 19, 2006
  7. Which, once you meet a certain benchmark/threshold, managed over-time in a consistent fashion, probably relegates his risk-of-ruin to a range of 1%-3% (ie, only through catastrophic system failure is there real risk in his trades) .. and I'm sure he has the gold buillion bars stashed away someplace.

    Hmph, thanks for the lesson.

    Best Regards,

    JJ :)
     
    #57     Nov 19, 2006
  8. Look in your PM....


     
    #58     Nov 19, 2006
  9. Trading is not gambling. I will end this debate for once and for all.

    Gambling in an economic view creates no wealth or whatsoever cuz you can bet on anything as silly as it sounds.

    Whereas when you are trading or speculating it adds wealth to the economy cuz you are investing your money into a corporation for example.


    Moreover, a trader can be consistently up for 20 or 30 straight days for example as opposed to a gambler when the odds are against him it will be very difficult for him to generate this kind of result.
     
    #59     Nov 19, 2006
  10. Professional gamblers make 95% of traders look like dog meat
     
    #60     Nov 19, 2006