To be helpful and show you that I am not just being an asshole here are the facts of the shit job done by the Junkaroos lawyer See highlights: "The action was begun in the Supreme Court on 3 October 2014, and a month later, on 5 November, UBS applied for summary judgment. The application came before Evans J on 23 March 2015. It is apparent from the transcript of the hearing, which has been put before the Board, that no real attempt was made to present the defendants’ case at this hearing. Counsel for the defendants had by mistake put the hearing into his diary for 25 March, as a result of which Mr and Mrs Starostenko were not present and Counsel Page 3 was not properly prepared. An affidavit had been sworn on behalf of the defendants which, when read with the voluminous correspondence exhibited, could be said to support the defence to which the Board has referred. However, it was still in the process of being filed and was not before the court. Counsel for the defendants observed that “to that extent” the application for summary judgment was opposed. But he added that Counsel for the Bank had drawn his attention to certain authorities to which, he said, he had no answer. This appears to have been a reference to authorities such as National Westminster Bank Plc v Skelton [1993] 1 All ER 242, 246 (per Slade LJ) to the effect that a counterclaim was not normally a sufficient basis for resisting a mortgagee’s summary application for possession. It appears not to have been appreciated that the defence which the defendants wished to raise was not just that the debt was abated by the cross-claim, which might in some circumstances have amounted to an equitable setoff, but that the event of default which was said to have made the debt payable was brought about by UBS’s breaches of duty. This may or may not have been a good point, but Counsel’s concession meant that that was never decided. Evans J gave judgment for the debt claimed and for possession in default of payment, without prejudice to the defendants’ right to pursue their counterclaim. In my honest opinion @CSEtrader ...your lawyer is an idiot and fucked you over bigtime. You have a seemingly good case for malpractice against your own lawyer because they are the reason you got a summary judgement against you. Your lawyer screwed up the hearing date and then failed to file the defense papers. Your lawyer also had no counter argument when UBS lawyer shot him down. SUMMARY: UBS did not fuck you....your LAWYER did! Go after him. EDIT: If your lawyer raised the above defense in green you might have stayed the summary judgement order against you. YOUR LAWYER FUCKED YOU. GO get another lawyer and sue the first one for malpractice but you will not be able to undue the summary judgement against the house.
All of the court decisions the past 2 years said is that the Junkaroos could not file their appeal in the Court of Appeals because they failed to ask for leave to do so from the court granting the summary judgement which was granted because Junkaroos lawyer was a fuckstick. Now they are two years past and have to keep going back to SC but in the meantime the house is taken legally and they are losing time. Court said they represented themselves a few times in mistaken filings. So they had a shit lawyer and then defended themselves at times in filings. Bad counsel all around.
Order to vacate the house in December 2017 with permission to appeal the summary judgement. https://jazzhouselyfordcaypropertys...2018/07/supreme-court-order-dated-21dec17.pdf
Interestingly the Supreme Court decided to allow Junkapoo to make an appeal but decided against vacating the summary judgement. legally that means the court saw no grounds to reverse the summary judgement that UBS was entitle to foreclose on the house due to failure to make interest payments timely. As a lawyer this is very telling...
The posts here from 181 up to 197, except mine 196, and all the rest belongings to those row posters , are showing g the total ignotancy of the posters, they luck of education . Please, read our website, legal peoceedi GS documents, feel free to ask me and make your own DD. Most - those two ate losi g traders, so love them because at the and the part of more bey you ate getting from the market everyday are coming g from then. I have not pur Antone yet on my ignore list but those two ( or one with two avatars) ate looking to be to noisy and ignorant.
I dont need to read your posts...I read the ACTUAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS FILED in BAHAMAS. Your lawyer screwed up the date of the hearing and did not appear on time, then showed up with no legal arguments to counter the bank's arguments and even conceded on points. Then you represented yourself by filing incorrect appeals. ALL THE INFO IS RIGHT THERE IN THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS. Are you saying the Supreme Court of Bahamas, Court of Appeals and Privy Council are all lying and you did NOT mortgage your house to invest the money? C'mon...take the free legal advice...sue your lawyer for malpractice maybe... As for losing traders....let's not forget you lost your house leveraging it up to trade the proceeds. That clarifies who made the losing trades. Keep calling me a losing trader but I have legal documents that prove you made some bad trades and are paying for it. As for education, I know how to read a calendar and show up for my court date hearing when my house is at stake. I also know how to read the law and know how to file appeals. I also do not need education to know you don't leverage your house your family lives in to trade futures and stocks.