Tradex Forex Journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Tradex, Jun 7, 2020.

  1. Tradex

    Tradex

    I said "UP 100 pips" because I thought he was talking about the GBP/NZD, and this is precisely how this whole conversation started.

    You know all this perfectly well but you just want to troll and pollute my thread because deep down you are seriously deranged. I received private messages about you but I did not believe them. Now I know that they were telling the truth, you are indeed a complete nutcase.

    Keep trolling and I will report you, you and the other troll who still does not have the guts to post his own trades in his own Trading Journal.
     
    #121     Jun 11, 2020
  2. destriero

    destriero


    OIC, so you interpreted "HE" as "GBP/NZD" ... dude, you're fake. neww stated you were down 100 pips. You were not in GBP/NZD so why would @newwurldmn be referring to a position that you haven't traded?

    Your assumptions SUCK as much as your trading.
     
    #122     Jun 11, 2020
  3. destriero

    destriero

    So to sum-up this journal... mention an FX pair and then wait for it to move, in this case due to volatility in equities, and then take credit for the move regardless of direction. Lose money, rinse, lie, repeat. PLEASE report me.
     
    #123     Jun 11, 2020
    contra likes this.
  4. Tradex

    Tradex

    Fellow Forex traders, as a reminder here are the trading results so far:

    EUR/CAD: Breakeven
    CAD/CHF: Breakeven
    NZD/CHF: -10 pips
    EUR/CAD: -33 pips
    AUD/NZD: -21 pips

    Total : -64 pips (as clearly mentioned in post #100).

    (Note: There is no imaginary GBP/NZD trade, pay no attention to the usual trolls.)

    Also note that profitable trading has nothing to do with the winning percentage. You can lose more than 70% of the time and still make a killing, if you keep your losses short and let your profits run.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2020
    #124     Jun 11, 2020
  5. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    approx -64% with the usual 100:1 leverage. So you need to make 300% just to break even, right?

     
    #125     Jun 11, 2020
  6. Tradex

    Tradex

    You sure you finished high school?

    To break-even with a 64 pip loss I need to make 64 pips, end of story. A single winning trade will do the trick.

    There is no 300% return I need to generate because the percentage of trading capital I allocate to each trade remains small at all times.
     
    #126     Jun 11, 2020
  7. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    Not when you lever 100:1 as is usual in forex.

    Do the math your net worth ($100) x .36 x Y = 100.

    Solve for Y

    This is based on your fictitious trade.
     
    #127     Jun 11, 2020
    contra and destriero like this.
  8. Tradex

    Tradex

    Here we go again, more trolling. Some guys just cannot stop.
    The 100 to 1 leverage is simply the maximum leverage given by your broker, it does not mean you have to use it. Only fools would use 100% leverage on each trade.
     
    #128     Jun 11, 2020
  9. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    Why would you advocate that in your hypothetical trade?
     
    #129     Jun 11, 2020
    destriero likes this.
  10. Tradex

    Tradex

    I seriously doubt you are a trader with all this non-stop trolling activity.
    Go finish "Forex trading for Dummies" or something.
     
    #130     Jun 11, 2020