I think he was merely pointing out the hypocrisy of acting in the exact opposite fashion to the teachings of Jesus.. an all too familiar christian trait
I think you refer to the 3rd post on the following page of that particular thread: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=62386&perpage=6&pagenumber=10 Anyone who cared to take a moment to see how you took quotes of mine entirely out of context for your own purposes could see that you are entirely lacking in intellectual honesty and personal integrity. Interested persons needed only to see my posts in their full context to see how your subsequent interpretation came from a parallel universe. You were a fraud in that thread and you are no different here.
Even discounting the fairytales it is impossible to take christianity seriously when not a single christian seems able to follow the teachings of its founder... and at the extreme end we have the church murdering by the millions, raking in unimaginable profits (so much for the eye of a needle)... and protecting child molesters among their own ranks... The last christian died on the cross!
It's clear that you were attempting to spread someone else's truth. You are... well, an apostle I guess. Have you ever overheard someone who was clueless about trading yammer to someone else like they knew what they're saying? Do you crack up at their misnomers and mal-aprops, knowing they will never understand how silly they sound? That's all that happened here. My ego and your zealotry brought us together. It's funny what misguided people do for a false cause. No MIT PhD is going say the things you said. The Mitfud and I would simply disagree that he manipulated mathematical parameters to diminish ridiculous odds against his desired numerical result. His math is, no doubt, correct. I have no cause, and the effect has been the cause of my woe. Spread this. It sounds like it means something. Anti-Madder
How so? Where did I do that? Also, since Iâm not trying to be exact, despite your claim that I am, I used words like âabout.â I used these particular words so no one would assume I was attempting to be precise. Actually, Iâm using numbers developed by those who are doing the research and are published in peer-reviewed journals. I guess you could disagree with them if you want to. What six thousand year packets? So, I didnât do the math? How so? Could you give me a quick Yes or No on the following, just to see what you understand: 1. Is the rate of timeâs passage fixed? 2. If not, do conditions affect it? 3. Would the rate of timeâs passage be the same for an observer present at the beginning of the universe as it would be for us on a current-earth frame of reference? 4. Is the speed of light variable or constant? Also, if speed of light is a constant, why does it appear to vary? What is the relative part of Einsteinâs theory? I like it myself. Would you agree that for light time does not exist?
Now that you bring this up, show us that you're really smart. (1) Who were the parents of that "brother"? (2) How do you know that?
Clearly, sir, you have cognitive issues and I do not wish to cause you any additional discomfort aside from my response to this post of yours. I do not accept the bible as true. I use it merely to point out the inconsistency of some people who quote it and allegedly believe it but who do not live by its precepts. Therefore, the hypocrisy I wish to point out is theirs. If this notion is too difficult for you to handle, you may wish to break it down into smaller components for easier digestion. I wish you all the luck that you need.
That is a tough one but I'll have a crack at it... for the father I am going to go with Joseph of Arimathea, he claimed the body as is a fathers right... and for mother I will stick with Mary but with one proviso, she was obviously a priestess
Please show how these quotes were taken out of context. If you cannot, then I think your own credibility, or what little remained, will evaporate completely.