There is a saying something like this...when a man starts telling me how religious he is, I check to make sure that I still have my wallet...
Our economy need suffering children; who else would work in sweatshops to make cheap goods for us? That's why there are still suffering children. It's our choice. Kind of like how the "War on Drugs" means that Afghanistan is still the #1 drug producing country in the world, year after year after year; it's our choice! The WSJ had an article about this a few weeks ago.
Cute. A little science for you. (Warning: gets very complex and may hurt the brain for those unprepared to consider.) Einstein discovered by analysis that light is peculiar to our universe and doesn't seem to conform to universal laws; all conforms to light, making things relative to light (hence the "relativity" of this theory, which is no longer a theory, but a law). Although the speed of light is known to us as 186,000 m/sec, in reality, the actual speed is instantaneous, but the rate of time's passage varies (is "relative") to make it appear that light always moves at this speed. Light is a form of radiation which can be measured by temperature as an indication of its speed. Physicists agree on the temperature at which the basic building blocks of matter will separate out of a super-hot mixture such as the Big Bang. This temperature, which some call the point of quark confinement or decoupling, is also a measure of the speed of light, since temperature is one of the ways to measure radiation. The background temperature (CBR) of the universe currently is known to be around 3 degrees K, which is another speed for the early-universe light's emission, which is much lower (slower) than when it was emitted. Since the speed of light cannot change (it's a law), the rate of time's passage must be different. If you do the math (I have), you'll see that the rate of time's passage for an observer present at the beginning of the universe -- until now -- would be about 6 days. From our perspective, looking backwards, there has been about 14 billion years. The two numbers are in agreement and agree with the bible. Also, if you were an intelligent ray of light, all events in our universe would appear to happen at the same time, as time would not exist for you. You would see the beginning and end of time as the same set of events with no separation in time. The bible says that God is light, who "sees the end from the beginning."
These questions (challenges) were made on the Dec27 last: 'Obviously' those questions were too much for them or maybe they are not trading anymore because they went broke and quit or perhaps they have found better use for their time than to give attention to cooldude the troll. But, damn, they have a religious obligation to shed light into the minds of unbelievers. No? :eek:
Oh dear... another sad 6 minute egg theory... 500 years ago you'd be telling us the earth is at the centre of the universe and that Copernicus fellow is deranged
I see you have no argument against the logic and science of my post, else you would have presented it. But, hey, if you can't demolish an argument, make fun of it, eh?
What is there to argue? anyone who thinks relativity is a law is obviously prepared to twist science to their own ends... relativity is not a law, there are still many things it does not explain.. but lets not let that little inconvenience stop you from pushing your little pagan myth based religion... ps: how many man/gods were born on 25th of december of a virgin and died only to be resurrected again?.... quite a few long before Jesus... the whole religion is a sad pagan rip off without the accompanying mystery tradition and esoteric knowledge
He wasn't telling him what all must do to enter heaven. He was telling him what would give him "treasure in heaven." If I gave all I had to the poor, I might be guilty of violating scripture that says, "He who doesn't provide for his own family is worse than an unbeliever." I notice all the anti-christ (ians) like to quote scripture against christians. Which is it? -- you believe scripture or you don't? If so, then you have a problem. If not, you can't quote it against someone, even to point to their hypocrisy; because you can't point to hypocrisy this way without exposing your own.
Historians have ripped the bible version Jesus to shreds and it is pointless trying to tell the "believers" the truth... their life is too enmeshed with what they have been told... they dont have the inner strength to face life without their religious crutch