When war is neither âhotâ nor âcoldâ, money is the bullet Knowing that, CCP is producing money (not M2, but GDP) fast, with China GDP grows 11.1% in Q1, 2007. Can China manage its growth in a sustainable fashion? The question prompted some kind of cross-board selling of CCP200 related stocks and funds in US last Thursday , the stock marketâs way of asking questions, and often the way for investors to buy at dip. The answer to the above question is not in economics, but in politics, or PA, one of my terms. For readers with further interest, I suggest a reading list started with Vladimir Leninâs book such as âState and Revolutionâ. Lenin basically transformed Marxâs theory into organization and practice, and he was one of the masters of âorganizational politicsâ in human history. That may sounds too crazy, even in terms of âout of boxâ, so instead, letâs just review briefly the Chinese soap opera âMajor Maâ. In the story, âMajor Maâ, together with a group of his homeless teenagers buddies was arrested by police, when they started a debt collection business. Major Ma questioned the police: what is wrong with collecting debt from those corporate debtors? The police read him a CCP document (not really a law) that âat present, no individuals or corporations should be allowed to set up any debt collection business, whatsoeverâ. I guess, the story time was when many China state enterprises, including banks, were notoriously âtrapped in a debt triangleâ, and everybody thought China banks would collapse going forward. Of course, a few WS folks, such as GS, were smart enough and managed to get a few pieces of China banks before they went IPOs in 2005 and 2006. The point is: with a history of 56 years of âhotâ and âcoldâ war experience, and Master Lenin and Maoâs theories, particularly of those âOrganization and Managementâ, and with a 40M party âMBAsâ managing various governmental and corporate businesses, what cannot be âmanagedâ? Except for "manufacturing Bill Gates Types". It seems that not only people like Major Ma is increasingly âUnite Around Partyâ, but also other Asian countries: âThe share of Developing Asia's intraregional exports went from 26% in 1985 to 37% in 2005. ⢠Asian exports have tilted increasingly to China, especially for Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Koreaâ (Steven Roach) â the Japan-China linkage is now getting heightened focus at the senior political level - reinforcing the doubling of trade flows between the two nations in the past five years. Asia's two largest economies collectively account for 82% of pan-regional GDP. If they become increasingly integrated, that would have profound implications for the rest of the region - to say nothing of the global economy.â (Steven Roach) Asia, like Eurozone, is not only âdecouplingâ from US (âbeta), but also getting their own âalphasâ going. So, now we have two growing Asia and Euro âalphasâ and a stagnating (1H 2007) to a goldilocks (2H2007& 2008) US âbetaâ. (Stephen Jen) Is this what behind the global stock marketâs recovering rally from the Shanghai Scare? A soldier never dies, neither the war. Todayâs war is neither âhotâ or âcoldâ, it is the one between bears and bulls. Just donât miss the bullet. /marketreflections.com/
You almost have to jump, just like SOLF FA, TA, PA are all âtoolsâ, and bears, bulls, Fed, socialists, CCP, and capitalists are all âplayersâ, and S&P500, CCP200 are all âchipsâ. My philosophy of trading or investing is ârole playingâ, seeing the market and economy though the eyes of âbears, bulls, Fed, socialists, CCP, and capitalistsâ, figuring out how they play the âchipsâ. LT, I am a bull, and sometimes my trading getting into the way of my thinking: I think I made right call on the bottom of the recent correction, but overestimated the length of it; My repeated âcorrectionâ picks of CAF, FXI and PGJ starting on Feb 27. 2007 have been good, and my recent âgrowthâ picks are SOLF and TSL, started on Apr 17, 2007. I sometimes get âplugged inâ, as one reader commented, and emotion should always be controlled. By the way, I always like the comments from readers, which are helpful. And I hope I have answered some of your questions today. So, what is the recent thinking of the smart bulls? Letâs start from Mundell (an economist and Nobel laureate): âMundell was unstoppable and Socratic. He never, never in the time I saw him in Chicago answered any question other than with another question. He always held that what was already on paper was too stale to look at or talk about, what was just in the making was the challenge.â âWhat did it do for us? The most extraordinary learning experience, questioning established truth, learning to think through a proposition, getting a view of the economy in our head with which to think on our feet.â (Rudi Dornbusch) This is almost a perfect description of stock marketâs role as a forward thinker. Letâs repeat one more times: âwhat was already on paper was too stale to look at or talk about, what was just in the making was the challenge.â To the stock market, âWhat was already on paperâ is US âbetaâ: economy in the range of âstagnating a littleâ to âgoldilocksâ, and stocks are still cheap, particularly the big caps with international exposure, although lacking growth in general. âWhat was just in the makingâ and imagination are Euro and Asia growing âalphasâ, and particularly Asia, where the imbalance of growing savings vs. the lack of domestic financial assets is also âgrowingâ. About valuation: âValuation - High, But Not at Sell Levels: While the forward P/E is 21% above the long-term average, Asia-Pacific remains attractive versus interest rates and on our COV framework. Valuation is high, but not a sell signal.â (MS) Having just recently successfully âcorrectedâ bulls, bears are now far away from âcapitulation pointâ: Public/NYSE specialist short sales are currently at 9.45, as compared to 3.81 (12M low) on 11/17/06, and 13.15 (12M high) on 0316/07), 1.04 (5Y low) on 08/28/02, 13.15 (5Y high) on 03/15/07. (IBD) And having just recently capitulated around 03/15/07, bulls are now full of âanimal spiritsâ, and they are ready for âjumpingâ more, and so is SOLF, and perhaps TSL as well, even TA wise. Marketreflections.com
The capitalismâs enemy: not Marxism, but âclimate changeâ The death of Yeltsin, unlike the picture in which he stood atop a tank, defing the August coup attempt of 1991, did not get much attention from international media. And Gorbachev, once the boss of Yeltsin and everybody else in the Soviet Communist Party, has been largely forgotten these days, so is his once famous âglasnostâ (liberalization, opening up) and âperestroikaâ (reconstruction), etc If going back to August 1991, we will be probably more interested in checking out the indexes: August 1991 Dow: 3016 S&P: 387 Nasdaq: 525 After Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, the Soviet CP collapsed under the 4th or 5th generation of leadership of Gorbachev, almost as John Foster Dulles had predicted. Dulles was a cold war warrior. He predicted that, by the third or fourth generation, Communist party leaders would lose their communist zeal and gradually change color, allowing their people to become free. Dulles enunciated the policy of "peaceful evolution" rather than war as the means to free the "enslaved people" in the Soviet Union, China and other communist nations. He was US secretary of state from 1953 to 1959. Of course, he didnât anticipated that Chinese people, still under the CCPâs leadership, are now just as âfreeâ, good and crazy in making money like everybody else, if not âcrazierâ. From 1953 to 1959: Dow: 278-601 S&P: 24-56 The âhot warâ: Vietnam war, 1959 to 1975 From 1959 to 1975: Dow: 601-768 S&P: 56-83 From the end of Vietnam war to the âThe Fall of the Berlin Wallâ: 1975 to 1989 Dow: 768-2692 S&P: 83-363 Nasdaq: 70-472 And the ânew global capitalismâ: 1989-present Dow: 2692-12953 S&P: 363-1480 Nasdaq: 472-2524 When would âhotâ or âcoldâ war return? Not in the foreseeable future. CCP just recently declared that China will be busy with its current style âyoung socialismâ for at least 100 years, as it just passed the âproperty rights lawâ, in which all land is owned by state representing all people, but some of it will be leased to those who can afford, and the lease will be automatically renewed every 70 years. So, donât worry, just stay focused at making money. The war is now between capitalism and âmother natureâ Having overwhelmed its Communist foes and prospered globally with a few different âbrandsâ, particularly the famous âChinese socialist styleâ, the capitalism now find its new enemy is environment. âFit to surviveâ. Capitalism survived Marxâs revolution call by creating a middle class, and recently it has received an âenvironmental callâ from US Supreme Court, when the Court has ruled that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, on Apr 4, 2007 The US Supreme Courtâs ruling is historical, and it is âThe Roe vs.Wade of Alternative Energy(thepanelist.com): âThe 5-4 decision has been widely criticized, with some calling the move an act of "judicial imperialism". Article III of the Constitution states that the courts should not meddle in executive branch authority, and in revoking EPA policy, the Supreme Court has showed no modesty. Critics argue that the decision is similar to the Roe vs. Wade abortion decision, where judges decided they must save the people from themselves. In a nutshell, the Supreme Court ruling states that global warming is too important to be left to an elected president or Congress.â In a sense, the US Supreme Court, just like CCP, believes that capitalism has to be âmanagedâ sometimes. âGreen and clean energyâ is gaining unprecedented momentum now everywhere: economically and politically, domestically and internationally. If internet is a âlegacyâ of âcold warâ and has hit âbigâ, what about âgreen and clean energyâ in the euphoria of global capitalism? I donât believe that âgreen and clean boomâ will be as crazy as âinternet boomâ, but the momentum behind it is hard to be overestimated. Marketreflections.com
Animal spirits chases sun "Most, probably, of our decisions to do something positive, the full consequences of which will be drawn out over many days to come, can only be taken as the result of animal spirits - a spontaneous urge to action rather than inaction, and not as the outcome of a weighted average of quantitative benefits multiplied by quantitative probabilities." (The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money, 161-162) Keynes, understanding the âanimal spiritsâ of market participants(or agents) in a capitalist economy, postulates that government shall intervene when necessary. Largely due to Keynesâs foresight, Fannie Mae (originally the Federal National Mortgage Association), was created in 1938 as part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal plan. As kind of a âgovernmentâ business, sort of like those CCP200, Fannie Mae retained special perks such as a credit line with the Treasury and state-tax exemptions that created a perceived link with the federal government that allowed it borrow more cheaply than other private companies. Freddie Mac, formally called the Federal Home Loan and Mortgage Corp., was created in 1970 to provide competition for Fannie Mae. Today, More than $6 trillion of mortgage bonds are outstanding, dwarfing the amount of U.S. government debt by about 50 percent. And particularly since 2001, when 911 prompted Fedâs series of rate cut, and China increasingly recycled its increasing trade surplus into US bond market after joining WTO Nov 2001, further stimulated US real estate boom: U.S. housing boom from 2001 to 2006 when median home prices increased 56 percent Amount of mortgage bonds outstanding increased 82 percent over that period. Of course, market participants took Uncle Samâs housing policy to the extreme: Subprime mortgage bond sales grew to $450 billion in 2006 from $95 billion in 2001, and today, as many as 2.4 million Americans may lose their homes, although they are only minority of those âliar loanâ holders. While Marx pointed out the âcontradictionâ of capitalism, i.e., the growing wealth and decreasing (in absolute and/or relative terms) income of working class, Keynes figured government could help. Why getting tied up to gold standard while State can printing money? Why state can not spend or lend when necessary with printed money? Why economy has to rely on âanimal spiritsâ? Of course, politicians, Fed or CCP and everybody else, as smart as they are, got it all. As to the todayâs environmental matters, where everybody, rich or poor of mankind, is at stake of âlife and deathâ, politicians as well as market participants, cannot be trusted, and strong state interventions are prescribed, and thatâs all what the US Supreme Courtâs ruling on April 4, 2007 is about. As âanimal spiritsâ further chases Sun, I added STP as another growth pick. marketreflections.com
Itâs so scary not to be biased Per wikipedia.org âA bias is a prejudice in a general or specific sense, usually in the sense for having a preference to one particular point of view or ideological perspective. However, one is generally only said to be biased if one's powers of judgment are influenced by the biases one holds, to the extent that one's views could not be taken as being neutral or objective, but instead as subjective. A bias could, for example, lead one to accept or deny the truth of a claim, not on the basis of the strength of the arguments in support of the claim themselves, but because of the extent of the claim's correspondence with one's own preconceived ideas. This is called confirmation bias.â I am biased and scared when reviewing of my âbadâ trades, hate facing failures of my own trading. I am biased in the sense that I am âautomaticallyâ delighted to see the âniceâ comments about my posting and âde-delighted â when words such as âcrabâ came out. Well, we are all human beings or âanimalsâ. Contrary to the common sense, it takes courage and effort not to be biased. In a futile effort of trying figuring out âwhyâ, I came back to the âanimal spiritsâ Keynes had talked about market participants. In a sense, âanimal spiritsâ may be the âcoreâ of our spirits as an individual, in the sense that we are naturally âselfishâ, âself-centeredâ, âself-worthâ, âegoâ, etc. The full animation of âanimal spiritsâ is displayed daily in the anonymous financial market, and once a while in the âbalance of powerâ in international relations. Per wikipeia.org: âA balance of power exists when there is parity or stability between competing forces. As a term in international law for a 'just equilibrium' between the members of the family of nations, it expresses the doctrine intended to prevent any one nation from becoming sufficiently strong so as to enable it to enforce its will upon the restâ. Of course, now, US, China and their alike are strong enough, sometimes, or not strong enough other times, when enforcing âTreaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weaponsâ on Iran and North Korea. Of course, US would say we had nuke because Soviet Union got one, and China would say we had nuke because you guys had it first. What about Iran and North Korea? just shut up, you âevilsâ. Unlike market participants who are openly âselfishâ, politicians often claim that all they have in their minds are the interest of people who they represent and get power from, politicians being almost everybody in the entire spectrum of politics, from Soviet CP, CCP, to Republicans whose âBoy Geniusâ being Karl Rove. Of course, there are differences or progresses in the political systems of countries, as much as we could have. And in the international arena, UN is better than without UN. My this post would not have been published in China, and here in US, itâs published already as I write, just never going to appear in the mainstream media for âqualityâ reasons. I actually appreciate Karl Rove when his famous âRovismâ claims that "All politicians operate within an Orwellian nimbus where words don't mean what they normally mean, but Rovism posits that there is no objective, verifiable reality at all. Reality is what you say it is, ..." (per wikiepedia.org). At least, Rove thinks that those non-politicians such as us would figure it out anyway. Of course, Rove was speaking in an extreme way. Politicians, just like salesman, have to do promotions to do their jobs, and lines between promoting and lying are often ambiguous in reality and in their minds. That said, I am a trader/investor per se, and would only talk about politics when it relates to market place. About Fed, I try to figure out towards whom and when Fed is going to be âbiasedâ, âJoe (employment)â, or âbond investors(inflation)â. That seems as much as WS cares, and I can't care more than they do. About CCP, I try to figure out how they are going to play in the capitalism game. That seems as much as WS cares, and I canât care more than they do. Speaking of bond investors, they are still buying 2Y notes with a yield 60 base points below Fedâs overnight lending rate of 5.25%, since market is still thinking Fed may cut the rate sometimes, although less enthusiastically. âThe December Eurodollar futures yield rose 4 basis points to 4.99 percent. The yield is the market's forecast for the interest rate on three-month bank deposits, which closely tracks the Fed's target for the overnight lending rate between banks. The three- month rate currently is 5.36 percentâ (Bloomberg.com) âIan Shepherdson of High Frequency Economics on Bloomberg's chart of the day sees the fed funds target sinking to 3.75% by Mar on increasing unemployment & slowing growth. He says, "A further substantial leg downwards is very likely over the next few months, as cross-infection from the housing crunch spreads and the lagged effect of higher interest rates bites,'' & is looking for 07 GDP at 1.5%, with unemployment at 5.3% by Sept.â(Reuters) Bond investors are still âworriedâ, and contrarian wise, thatâs the âwall of worriesâ on which stock indexes further climb. As mega caps are being bought and bought, and becoming more âexpensiveâ, investors would start chasing small-mid cap âgrowthâ, and likely CCP200 solar will be further chased, and I added STP to my growth picks today. Marketreflections.com
You just donât want to be outsmarted, by nobody Rich or poor, strong or week, communist or capitalist, we all have to play in this increasingly popular capitalism game, as long as we are alive. Except for a few incidents here and there such as the recent killing of Chinese oil workers in Africa and the attempted attack in Saudi Arabia, I donât see any serous challenge to the global capitalism as we know. However, I agree with Marx that the capitalism is not a perpetual system beyond which mankind cannot progress any more. But who cares? Capitalism is so far the most âcivilizedâ, âfairâ and productive game. Every individual has the potential to play to his best. I have been recently watching a Chinese soap opera produced in Taiwan, about a power struggle in a famous university hospital, where the game is about how to get promoted into professorship and become Chief of Surgery. The old professor and Chief, Mr. Tang, got a stroke upon hearing that instead of himself, his competition, Chief of Internal Medicine was appointed as the CEO of the Hospital. Mr. Tang was outsmarted. He was even more upset when knowing that His deputy Chief of Surgery, Mr. Qiu, one of his past students, âsurrenderedâ to the new CEO in order to become Chief of Surgery after Mr. Tang. Seeing the old Professor and Chief paralyzed in the bed and tears in his eyes, his wife cursed his âenemiesâ, now including his old student, Mr. Qiu. âDonât blame them, it is not their fault, and nobodyâs fault. Itâs the name and rule of the game.â The old Chief told his wife. Determined to play to the end, the old Chief struggled in his wheelchair into the room where weekly âMeetings of Chiefsâ was held, and called Mr. Qiu the âbitchâ in front of everybody, with most of them his past students. Mr. Tang struggled to stand up and walked towards the Chair of Chief of Surgery. His past student, Mr. Qiu, embarrassed, stood up and left the Chair, trying to help his old Professor to sit on it, only to see Mr. Tang collapsed just a few inches away from the Chair. Although frequently writing about Chinese or US ârulersâ, politicians, Fed, Wall Streets, I really donât have any negative or positive feelings towards them. They are just doing their jobs, playing their roles in the game, the way they are supposed to play, which I am always curious about. âIf you can't beat them, just join themâ, and one of âthemâ is Morgan Stanley, which produces nice reports. And one of their reports commented on the Russiaâs recent decision on April 11, 2007 to invest part of Russia CBâs reserve âin a wider array of assets, including equities, oil options and other assets outside the sovereign bond space.â Obviously, China CB and other CBs are making similar moves. MS further observed that âjust as private investors are turning somewhat nervous about valuation, leverage and other risks, SWFs (part of CB reserves) are moving into risky assets.â Along with CBs are also those Private LBO guys, they are basically selling bonds and buying equities, in taking those targeted companies private with borrowed money. âthe returns on (risk-free) sovereign bonds and those on equities are very different, with sovereign bond yields being remarkably low while the return on equities is relatively high. For these two markets to be less out-of-sync, both bond yields and the P/E ratios will need to rise. The fact that private equity flows and M&A activities are so strong is a reflection of the perception that equity prices are too low, relative to the prevailing interest rates and the pool of liquidity available to be deployed. In my writings, I have highlighted (i) excess global liquidity arising from a fundamental mis-match between savings and investment, (ii) a global shortage of investable financial papers (our âAsset Shortage Hypothesis), and (iii) a more balanced global economy between the three pillars supporting risky asset prices. We now add the SWFs as the fourth pillar, one that is longer term in nature. â As powerful as institutions are, the game is not really institutionals vs. individuals, it is everybody vs. everybody. Otherwise, the individuals, or at least most of us, would have been long âwiped outâ already, and that is one of the progresses the capitalism has made for us. Individual by definition is never going to have the âinstitutional edge or powerâ, but there is no limit in his acquiring of intelligence or rationality, and only with that, he can progress. In that sense, anybody is my âheroâ, as long as he has some âmind powerâ for me to learn from, whether he is Marx, Lenin, the senior with âread my lipsâ or the junior with âmission accomplishedâ , Fed, CCP, etc. And I wish my daily âfoesââmarket makers also publish some âpropagandaâ for me to study as well. They just never say anything, and they donât have to. Except for learning from my âheroesâ, What else could I do? As to todayâs market: âGive me a break!â, bears would yell, and I agree with them, TA wise. But how? Even the bleak GDP numbers would not deter the bullsâ relentless advance. marketreflections.com
Pricing a world on board the global capitalism train co-captained by US & China Briefly scanning through âA global history: from prehistory to the 21st century, by L.S. Stavianosâ, I canât find any period in human history where almost the entire population on earth of different counties, of different cultures, and of still very different political and social systems all synchronize and standardize on any one common economic system , not even remotely. However, the whole world now is on board the train of global capitalism, with its passenger population is still growing in almost every language, with Capitan Uncle Sam working on getting nations in Arabian world on board via the Western entry of âfreedom and democracyâ, and with Comrade CCP trying pulling North Korea on board from an Eastern entry of âsocialist market economyâ. Amazingly, Uncle Sam and CCP have been teaming up with each other very well as co-captains of the global capitalism train, not so much because they become friends now from being âfoesâ of each other in the past, but more likely out of choices. For CCP, having led its 1.3 billion people, or 20 percent of the world's population, march on the road of market economy since 1978, it has long past âthe point of no returnâ. âGrowth is the hardcore of all truthâ is legacy left by the architect of Chinaâs socialist capitalismâDeng Xiaoping, and today it has become âthe truth of all truthâ for every citizen. You just got to have money. Otherwise, you canât even âleaseâ a piece of land which is supposedly owned by you through the state, according to the newly passed âproperty rights lawâ. Similarly, you would have to pay state government property tax on the land you own in US. âAll crows are of the same black colorâ is the Chinese way of exposing the common nature of all âevilsâ. Capitalism is just not evil any more in China: everybody likes it and nobody wants to go back to Maoâs time. So, Captain CCP has to work hard and drive the train forward. For Captain Uncle Sam, âthe mission is yet to be accomplishedâ, the mission being its historical mission to prevail capitalism, freedom and democracy globally. The âdivision of laborâ between the âodd coupleâ seems have worked out pretty well. CCP, with the 20% of passengers on board the train being Chinese, is obviously focusing its attention on âgrowth engineâ related tasks. Uncle Sam is still enthusiastically carrying on his old job as a âpolitician and policemanâ. Needless to say, Uncle Samâs job is often costly and vulnerable to attacks of âgangstersâ, if not âevilsâ. Unwilling and/or unable to take over Uncle Samâs job, CCP fully understands that if the train is sabotaged or overthrown in any way, such as energy crisis, military or political conflicts of significantly scales, the workfare and welfare of its 1.3 billion native passengers on board would be seriously threatened. Knowing that and CCPâs needs in keeping its low-key profile in world political matters, the corporation between Uncle Sam and CCP has been very implicit, diplomatic and effective. The progress of corporation in those sensitive but important non-economic areas is even more rapid than expected, just like Chinaâs GDP growth: US is less and less enthusiastic in criticizing China in the area of âhuman rightsâ, âfreedom and democracyâ, etc. And reportedly, China is even sending or already sent out a military delegation to Pentagon to improve its âreportâ on Chinaâs military and defense. What about Mr. Karl Rove? CCP would definitely need his talent in PR. So, how to price such a world? After all said and done, thatâs all what financial market participants would care about. Seeing the growing âcomradeshipâ between Uncle Sam and CCP, bond market, with its historical low yield on long end of the curve, and with the short-end of it being regulated by Fed, already give the answer to Mr. Gross, who has been complaining about ârisk not being paidâ: there is not much âterm or uncertainty premiumâ left anymore, and what you are complaining about? What about the stock investors? If there is not much upside potential for long bond yields, then PE for stocks have to expand, so its âyieldâ would not be too far away from the âparityâ between bond and stocks, as defined by Fed model. How much PE would have to expend? Look for the ânext immediate resistance levelâ, which was established in 2000, chart wise. marketreflections.com
Invest with trend, trade with MMs Trading, daily or swing, is largely a game with MMs, or market makers, particularly of those WS firms, such as GS, ML, and UBS, which are also among the 21 so-called primary dealers of bonds, who trade directly with the Fed. Functionally, MMs are supposed to create and/or facilitate market for securities with each security requires a few MMs, and are subject to certain regulations. Practically, maximizing trading profits is the goal for every MM, helped by MMâs institutional and other edges. Of course, as long as market opens, MM trades, mostly profitably, the more the better. Partially because of that, securityâs price often fluctuates away from FA or TA, or any analysis, and more so, the shorter the time frame is. Because of that, successful trading is more of experience and skills in gaming with MMs, less of FA or TA or any A. Besides, you have to love it and better doing it full time. Knowing that, a lot of traders prefer to stay away from high- volume stocks such as INTC, often because MMs for those stocks are the best ones in WS. As time frame expands, the advantages of âAâs such as FA, TA start to come up for investors who are good on those analysis. Yes, there is still an âearnings gameâ. âAhead of every quarter, Wall Street analysts have optimistic forecasts for company earnings. Then, as the quarter progresses and the earnings reports approach, estimates drop quickly (and sometimes sharply). This conservative approach lowers the bar of expectations. As a result, every quarter without fail, about two-thirds of companies beat the average Wall Street earnings estimate. Furthermore, the aggregate percentage gain in the S&P 500 companies' earnings typically exceeds Wall Street estimates by 2% to 3%. This is such a highly predictable result that it becomes expected. When a company reports earnings, it is often said that "earnings beat expectations" or something similar. In fact, what has really happened is that earnings have been compared to the recently-lowered average analyst estimates, not true market expectations. â(briefings.com) Why earning games? Why not? Still, the earnings, like other FA factors, particularly their trends, are largely analyzable, and market, particularly the indexes, tend to trend with âthe trend of economyâ or fundamentals. I donât believe that WS or anybody can really manipulate major indexes regularly. I have written repeatedly about the basic âtrend of economyâ as far as we can see now: USâ mature economy is probably trending towards more to âgoldilocksâ than to âstagnationâ, while the rest of the world is on the train of solid growth, and about 45% of S&P500âs revenue come from outside of US. As world economy grows, so is the need for green and clean energy, and that is another trend I am betting on. MMs can manipulate a stock, but they canât change the trend. Thatâs why I study or âguessâ the trend very hard, while day trading. Of course, any guess is still a guess, at its best. Marketreflections.com
âGone with the Windâ If you are an investor, you really need to chew US economic numbers, and the chewing almost becomes both a science and an art. The growth is .., the inflation is.., actual vs. expected, etc. Sometimes, my readers complain that they donât know what I am really talking about in my posts, partially because I am a trader. Besides, do we really know how many miles the US economy is from âstagnationâ and how many miles it is from âgoldilocksâ? Investors may care, but not traders. Investors normally have âideologyâ, either bullish or bearish one, just like Turkey military. âIdeologyâ makes you upset when the reality goes against you. In the case of Turkey, military threatens to overthrown the elected government if Turkey joins EU. Traders are free of âideologiesâ, because they donât want to be blinded or burdened by âideologiesâ and get slaughtered by market makers. âGone with the windâ, and the wind is MMs. MMs are ruthless, trading to maximize their daily profits. As to Fed, do we really know its agenda? Some of Fedâs minutes are not released to public, which has âno need to knowâ, I guess. What about their rights to know if they have one? I guess USD is somewhere in Fedâs mind , and Fed would not cut the rate unless US economy really âstagnatesâ, knowing that US financial market is supposed attract $2B a work day to finance USâs trade deficit. Speaking of USD: Euro, the USDâs primary competition, started its conception in 1960âs when European countries donât want to go along with US monetary policy burdened by Vietnam-war related inflation. What about Turkey militaryâs threat? Who cares. Turkey has to and will come along with the rest of world. By the way, Turkey military did not make traders ask for more for European CDS. Incidentally, CDS is âthe fastest growing part of the $370 trillion market for derivatives, financial obligations whose value is derived from the price of underlying assets such as bonds, equities, commodities and currencies.â (Bloomberg.com). $370T, about 5 times of world GDP, that is a lot to trade. Marketreflections.com
What is capitalism and democracy? A âcapital weighted averageâ Having stayed around in a few places, seeing âsocialismâ(close to but not really what Marx had in his mind), European and US capitalism, I have to say that US capitalism is the capitalism in its âstrongest formâ. Although largely a âcapital weighted averageâ, small guys without capital are still âcountedâ and sometimes impact âaverageâ due to large quantities of them, where in âsocialismâ small guys are âcountedâ less and with less impacts. Small guys can grow into big guys, in both systems, but with a much better chance to succeed in capitalism. Economically, China is developing its own version of capitalism and has been very successful so far. âCapital weighted averageâ is probably in its âstrongest formâ in financial market, in the sense that big âcapitalistsâ determine the price, and more so, the shorter the time frame is, and regardless of FA sometimes. The News Corp.âs $5B bid or $60 a share for DJ, as compared to marketâs trading price of $37 a share. is a perfect example, per Briefings.com: âThe Wall Street Journal is obviously a jewel asset, and the Journal does a fine job with their online divisions, but that hardly justifies the premium. Dow Jones had operating profits of $1.14 per share over the past four quarters. That puts the price/earnings multiple at 52.6 for a company that had higher revenue and profit per share ten years ago than it does today. The newspaper industry is in steady decline and growth prospects are questionable. Yet, if someone has the cash to pay $60 per share, the stock is worth just that.â Successful retail traders have long figured that out. They dare to trade to live and are look very âcourageousâ. Inside, they are very âhumbleâ, always trying in their own unique ways to look for and follow big traders who are the âbossesâ, and very often the institutional ones. The institutional traders, I guess, would try to look for and follow the smart ones among themselves, where the information may just âweightâ as much as capital. Speaking of information or FA, I think TA rather than FA matters more now in terms of market trend in short term. I think market has already passed âinflection pointâ where market has to âreflectâ seriously about âstagnationâ or âgoldilocksâ. Yes, todayâs job number are a little bit weaker and business investment are a little bit stronger, so what? Yes, US net national saving rate plunged to a record low of 1% of national income over the 2004-06 period, and US has to keep running current account and trade deficits in order to attract the foreign capital. That problem is still a problem, and may be a big one. Politicians of US and China, please work out something. Meanwhile, technicians, letâs focus on how big traders are going to trade from here. marketreflections.com