Trader P/L 2006

Discussion in 'Journals' started by mnx, Jan 3, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. As you Swifties know, our servers were brought down at 3.

    Still ended up with a good total although my ratio is horrible!
     
    #931     Apr 6, 2006
  2. razor02

    razor02

    Got hurt by Intel even though it was trading in a range for the longest time.
     
    #932     Apr 6, 2006
  3. Yes, Mschey is correct, thats my net P&L (what I take home), my screen shot shows my gross profits.

     
    #933     Apr 6, 2006
  4. hhho

    hhho

    system down again at 3:00 so calling it a day..
    was up 900 before noon then took a nasty hit and my p/l dropped back to 50 ;-( so i cant complain the EOD result...
     
    • apr6.jpg
      File size:
      30.4 KB
      Views:
      223
    #934     Apr 6, 2006
  5. alright day...spent most of it helpin and watchin some newbies that went live for the first time today......+500
     
    • 4-06.jpg
      File size:
      43.9 KB
      Views:
      229
    #935     Apr 6, 2006
  6. Hot shot tech dudes at swift decided to shut us down today at 3pm. Dont get it... too lazy to work after hours?!
     
    #936     Apr 6, 2006
  7. -37.27
    1600shares

    bleeding continues. never recovered psychologically since the STJ drop (12est), and guess where i sold? 79!

    made a few quick scalpes later in the day, that conclues the day
     
    #937     Apr 6, 2006
  8. promagma

    promagma

    7th day free from PDT,

    -350 on 1200 shares. I am bringing this to a journal.... until I can hang with the big boys ..... a double your money journal.

    :p
     
    #938     Apr 6, 2006
  9. Pretty good day considering the shit ratio. No real big crushing losses to speak of. I could get used to this.
     
    #939     Apr 6, 2006
  10. -257.12 on 56,092

    Was doing fine until I met RL. Hell, I don't even like the clothes..... Was up about 200, then wham! Size was huge because of the big bets in BRCD.
     
    #940     Apr 6, 2006
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.