According to the site, a 50k combine for 10 or 20 days still requires a profit objective of $3,500, unless you opt for a custom combine. http://www.topsteptrader.com/Combine
I think TST combines ala funded status is more geared for experienced traders than fledglings. Personally I see nothing wrong with working one's way to 80% payout in due time with OPM... whether it's your only account or side account, it is still 100% buying power you otherwise would not have. Right? It is free capital above & beyond what you have right now, end of story. The real challenge is performance metrics, risk versus reward. Take a $100k combine where the max limit is -$3000 draw and min gain is +$8,500 in a limited amount of time. That is asking for an upside performance of 8500 x 12 months basis = 102% annualized while never slipping below -3% shutoff at any given time. +102% annualized expectation / -3% max drawdown and done Now THAT is the real statistical skew. Lots of traders can do 100% or several times that annualized on leveraged capital (see Lescor's historical thread, etc) but normal drawdowns along the way are going to be much deeper than miniscule -3% in balanced scale. That is a lot of random upside performance with a short downside leash. If/when I get the free time I'll do another $150k combine for the sake of it. Right now I'm tied up with a real-money public trading program for the next six weeks. Then after that, I'm busy with non-trading pursuits thru year-end and into 2014. So the TST program is back-burner status for me. When I get around to it again, I'm fully aware of the challenges inherent to the current parameters. In my opinion, funded traders would accelerate if the metrics included a max drawdown limit but the upside minimum profit parameter had no time deadline to be reached. Whether it took ten sessions or fifty, so long as the downside risk was managed, upside minimum has no time constraint.
Are you serious? You obviously have not seen the trader contract once you are eligible to be funded. They specifically forbid trading for others or for your own account with numerous restrictions. For example, if you trade your own account, they will still want their cut of the profits. While they claim it is "not enforced", you would have to be a fool to sign such an agreement. There is other nonsense in their contract but this item alone is a show stopper. This service is not for experienced futures traders who can trade their own accounts, it is for people to find out if futures trading is for them without losing a substantial amount of capital. It is also good to discover how difficult this business really is and what it takes to pass the combines on a regular basis. Along the way they try to teach you about trading plans, discipline and how to be held accountable. I also think it is good for experienced futures traders to experiment with new strategies in a controlled simulation environment that holds them accountable with measurable results.
no I have not seen such a trader contract. Is that info available to the public listed in their website? I have never seen anything like that or any other restrictions. If it is visible to the public in their site, I somehow overlooked it
Very good observation. So if 5-10% of traders are profitable, how many can pass this kind of requirement? 0.1%??? Nobody can realistically expect 100% returns with such a small DD... And my other griefs with them not having a full disclosure about the whole set up. Oh, you have to pass a 2nd Combine what we call Live Trader Prep (they started to fully disclose it only this year). Oh you also have to pass a quite lengthy interview, but we are not listing what are the rejecting circumstances. Once you are Live, there is a very restricting contract (it seems) but the contract isn't available beforehand. Once you are Live, the hours are different then when you did the Combine (so then what is the point of letting you trade a Combine with a different set up?),etc.etc. It looks like just one obstacle after the other, and the trader mostly learns about it during the way, not in the beginning, so he could decide if it is worthy of his time and energy. What if you make it to Live trading after 6 months and learn about the contract restrictions what makes you to give up? Then they just wasted 6 months of your time.... Here is what should be on their first page: Dear aspiring trader, here is the process to get a fully backed account: 1. Pass the Combine. 2. Pass the pretty much obligatory LTP. 3. Pass an interview, here is the list of rejecting factors. (if any of those applies to you, don't even try) 4. Here is the contract, if you don't like it, don't even try. 5. Here are the special rules for Live trading, you might as well play by these during your Combine, because that's what you will follow with real money. So dear aspiring trader, we make you hop over so many obstacles, you better be a kangaroo, or you will be one when we are done with you... That is what I call full disclosure....
I strongly agree. Is such disclosed only after one has registered for the combine or before the combine registration although not on TST home page.
It's all disclosed WRB. They have been doing this since day one and when Michael was actively posting here, he mentioned it several times. BTW, Pekelo is wrong, it's not a 2nd combine you have to pass. In fact, there is no p&l requirement even. I'll try to explain what I believe it is in my opinion of course. Many posters here, especially the pekelo's of the world were complaining why would TST back a buy that simply got lucky on the combine in other words, they did nothing for 9 days then threw a hail mary the last day and had a big up day and they passed the combine. Believe it or not, guys like Pekelo actually were AGAINST this behavior. So the way TST would deal with that since they couldn't just reneg and say, we're not backing you even though we know you got lucky, they make you go through a one or two week preparation period where they give you a metric, usually it's just one, to follow. It's usually something you were weak on before. That's why they remove the p&l requirement in this phase and focus just on this weakness. Say for example, you never hit the daily stop but boy did you get close 3 different times. So they might have you trade for a week and cut the daily stop in half. Again, there is no p&l pressure but they just want to see you work on your weak spot. THIS is the one part of the combine I actually fully support. I was on these threads a year saying one of the big problems with the combine is that guys are not really trying to become good traders, they are simply trying to "win". The goal here is not to "win" the combine, the goal here is to actually become a consistently profitable trader. But most guys here will admit they their focus was trying to game the rules so they could "win". Well, this preparation phase kind of weeds out those that were simply gaming the rules. It doesn't cost you anything and no performance outcome will force you back to the regular combine. Think of it this way, if you can't pass that little preparation phase, do you really think you should be trading? I mean honestly? If you go back on the old threads I made a lot of suggestions on how TST could be better and how I would do it if I was running such a combine. Now that a year has gone by, I actually have a different point of view now. See, what I always said and what I truly believe is that the combine is really the best thing to come along for "new" traders. But NOT to get backing. The whole backing thing I believe puts the totally new trader in the wrong mindset. It would be like having an NFL combine for us middle aged guys on ET saying if we sign up for this physical training workshop, those that pass the workshop will get a tryout for an NFL football team. Well, that's wonderful but the fact of the matter is, no one on here is going to play in the NFL by simply doing a workshop and it might force guys to go about the training all wrong. What I would do now is this: I would create a combine with the pitch that the purpose is to have you work on your trading skills in a competitive and challenging environment. Instead of backing, I would give out prizes. Say a trip to Hawaii, or tickets to the superbowl or even just a night out on the town. One, this would would be enough to justify guys spending the money to do this. Two, they would set up goals for themselves that would lead them towards trading their own account with their own rules. Yet at the same time, the combine would allow them to build their discipline and their skills in an environment where they don't blow their life savings. Now you might say, and it has been said 1000 times, then why not just do a free sim on Ninja? Because the one key ingredient ALL these guys are lacking is personal discipline. A free sim is not going to give you that. You need to have some skin in the game. It needs to be competitive. I can't tell you how many guys at my old prop firm did the old ninja sim thing for a month or two and did very well. Then started with real money and lost everything. The problem was not their trading, but their emotions. Losing on a sim might make you upset, but losing real money does bad things to people. What would inevitably happen is they would have one bad day with real money and suddenly all hell would break loose trying to get it back. That would NEVER happen on a sim. This is why traders often resort to becoming option sellers. Because they can't handle losing money so they do something they think is safe and that will bring in consistent money. Losing money is something 95% of people simply cannot deal with it. Yet it's absolutely critical that not only you have the ability to handle that, but you have to thrive in that environment and still make the best decisions even during draw downs. TST is able to replicate that with the combine fees. You see this very clearly when guys get off to a bad start and they start getting reckless to "make it back". That is EXACTLY what they need to fix in the real world. THAT is what I saw at my prop firm that ruined guys. THAT does NOT exist on a free ninja sim. Guys on ET all think trading is about having the right "strategy" or "predicting" moves or "making calls". You see this on thread after thread after thread. That is NOT what trading is about. Trading is about standing in the middle of the intersection of risk and not getting hit. You have to take risk to make money, but yet you have to be able to deal with the consequences of taking risks. It's a catch 22. It matters not what moving avg cross over you are using or what your "call" is today on the spoos being up or down. It matters can you take the heat. Can you take the heat of managing a winner and not getting out too soon. Can you take the heat of being in a losing trader or being in a draw down. Most guys can't. But they convince themselves the reason they are not making money is because they are using the wrong moving avg. I think you will see another firm try to copy this model but I think someone will do what I'm suggesting and take the backing side of it out and instead create an environment that is both competitive and educational and yet still offer rewards for the trader to do well. I completely disagree with Austin that the combine is for established traders unless they want to practice trading a market they never traded before, like say Gold. TST really offers the most value for newbies who come on ET and read about all these ET billionaires that net 100 ticks a day in the spoos and live this lavish lifestyle. Just read the threads here and you'll see how these guys think. They think it's oh so easy. And people can complain about the rules all they want but you know what's killing most guys in the combine? It's not the p&l requirement or the duration or the % winners, it's the losses. It's hitting the daily stop or the max peak to trough draw down. And that is a function of discipline. I think TST has really showed guys just how hard this business is. I saw it first hand at the various prop firms I traded for. I got to see the p&l of traders at my firm. I got access to things most guys will never see. So my perspective on things is framed by that knowledge. Anyway, in typical ET fashion, the focus moves away from self and moves towards that outside of self. We always look for somewhere else to shift the blame. It can't possibly be us. It has to be the broker, the market, the HFT's, the Fed, the wife, the dog, the neighbors, their broadband cable connection, etc. The trader on ET rarely ever owns up to their shortfalls. All TST is doing is for a fee, they are providing a "mirror" that reveals things that most people don't want to see.