Timing QQQQ

Discussion in 'Journals' started by codedeep007, Feb 20, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ChicagoBuy,

    I think there is a reason that ET would not want to send out email alert, a free forum like ET would count on the number of visitors, sending email alert would defeat that purpose unless there is a fee associated with the alert, ... if I start to sending out email, I will put you on the list.

    Codedeep
     
    #231     Sep 27, 2008
  2. Close @37.45

    Regardless what system says, I would not bet tomorrow, if real time signal counts I would close much earlier today.

    The market condition is beyond back tested range (1999-Present), so whatever signal it produces is not reliable. My feeling is more like Oct 1987 before the market crashes another 20%.
     
    #232     Sep 29, 2008
  3. The signal was a BUY, but I don't want to bet
     
    #233     Sep 30, 2008
  4. Look like the system is still right
     
    #234     Sep 30, 2008
  5. That was a good call.

    Nice thread, btw, enjoy reading it.
     
    #235     Sep 30, 2008
  6. SEPT 30, BUY
    Hold (+1000)
     
    #236     Sep 30, 2008
  7. codedeep007,

    Do you think in this system you can incorporate a stop loss of say 3-4% just for the rare days like Monday?

    Thanks,
    Chicagobuy
     
    #237     Sep 30, 2008
  8. You can definitely put a stop loss 3-4% and still have a positive expectation (50% annual gain vs. 60%)

    There are a few days since 1999 that QQQQ up and down around 10%, there are many more days it has trading range more than 5%, the stop means that you are out of the market for the remaining of the day so in general it would reduce the expectation a little bit. But when you trade a blackbox system, have stop loss would definitely make you feel comfortable.
     
    #238     Oct 1, 2008
  9. OCT 1, SELL @38.5
    New (-1000)
     
    #239     Oct 1, 2008
  10. The Vote might pass Senate, the system is likely wrong, be careful.
     
    #240     Oct 1, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.