I don’t see how you can daytrade ES with stops less than 40 ticks. You need a break of your premise/idea to know you are wrong. With 40-50 handle moves becoming common you need to widen out.
I have been using 12 ticks SL for day trading for quite some time. 2 decades ago, I also used 12 ticks SL. when the market is very violent, I increase the SL by 2 or 3 times. I rarely use SL at 3X. When the market is so violent, the chances of getting STOPPED out are high. Also, my brain CPU is not powerful enough to handle such a market.
Thanks for the feedback. 40 ticks makes sense because the 1 minute candles are sometimes about 40 ticks in length. That's a lot more than I was hoping to use, but I'm tired of being stopped out of good trades, so I'll take a look at this amount.
My charts are all volume-based. I use > small volume 200V chart during the Asian & European sessions. Nowadays it hardly moves during the Asian session. > medium volume 600V chart during the US session > big volume 1800V chart also during the US session (with wider SL) Lately, a big volume chart is more suitable for the US session. Similarly, if you use the time-based chart, there is no such thing as one-size-fits-all time based chart. too short time frame - lots of fake signals too long time frame - you missed out on many opportunities
The smaller the stop, the bigger your r returns can be. The smaller the stop, the more chance you have been stop out. There is a sweet spot: small enough to get 5 r or bigger, big enough to have a win rate above 30%, and before you know it, you have a holy grail system.
As a breakout trend following trader, mine is below the breakout candle or previous swing low on your trading timeframe. If they are taken out, mostly that breakout is a fake.
Any decent trend on any timeframe is going to either be supported by the 10 or 20 ema. You avoid larger stop losses by staying closer to them for your entries. Typically, new trends stay to one side of the 10, then to the 20 as they protract.
I prefer the word "volatile" or words "high volatility". Yet, I'm curious why some use the words "violent" in their description. It's as if crime is increasing in the markets and/or people are running out of financial institution buildings screaming in pain and yelling for help. Another way or back to your word use, when the markets are "violent"... they're beating the hell out of traders and investors. wrbtrader