Gee whiz - this is like playing whack-a-mole. Radicals connected to Barack Obama just keep popping out of the woodwork. Now it is Obama's official blogger, Sam Graham-Felson - a known Marxist. Another Unsavory Obama Associate, Official Blogger a Communist? http://www.redstate.com/blogs/publi..._obama_associate_official_blogger_a_communist
Dream on, Morris. Dick's a dolt. The Obamessiah is about as much a heavyweight as I am. McCain would clean his clock and leave the MSM scrambling to say the debates were a "tie" even though Barry was terrible. Clinton could at least stand up to McCain. Not that I'm in McCain's corner, rat bastid that he is. Did anybody correct Dick the Dolt about the NC primary being closed not open? I bet he doesn't even care.
Barack Obama is a typical Democrat - loose with the facts. Here's a list of Barack Obama's lies. Check further down in the comments for even more: Obama's 20 Best Lies. Did I omit one? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2006575/posts
Superdelegate FAQ - IMAO Q. Why do the Democrats have superdelegates? A. Democrats got burned by democracy in many previous elections, so they decided that after the long primary battle between Democratic candidates for the president, they'll just go ahead and have their elites pick the winner. Q. So why even have the primary process and not just have the superdelegates pick the winner? A. The Democrats know they need to keep their voters busy or they might try thinking for themselves. Q. The Democrats claim that the superdelegates only enhances the primary process. Is this true? A. The stated purpose of the superdelegates is to make sure that the idiots who make up the Democrat base don't nominate someone unelectable. Q. Like Barack Obama? A. Yep. Shiny new candidate all the dummies flock to while the elites deep down know he's going to be a disaster. Q. Plus, the Democrats don't want the minorities to get all uppity. A. Well that goes without saying. Q. So who are the superdelegates? A. They are the elites of the elites -- the intelligentsia of the Democratic Party. Q. White people! A. Pretty much. While white men don't actually vote for Democrats anymore, they still run the party. Q. I don't trust white people. A. I'm not going to argue you should. The inventor of the Democrats' superdelegate system. Q. So how does one get to be a superdelegate? A. You have to work in the higher echelons of the party, laugh at religious people, and consistently underestimate middle America. Q. And be white. A. I didn't say it. Q. It's time to take the party away from those honkeys! A. Why is my questioner today a black militant? Q. Shut up, cracker! I'm asking the questions! A. Fine. Anymore questions? Q. So is the superdelegate system pretty much assured to rip the Democratic Party apart? A. Yes. You'd almost think some Republican operative came up with idea. Q. Who did come up with it? A. Someone named Rarl Kove. Is it just me, or does his mustache look fake? Q. All I know is that he looks white, so you know he's up to something! A. You can say that again, brother. Q. Don't brother me, honkey! A. Sorry.
Maybe He's Just Courting Edwards's Pansy Voting Bloc? IMAO In primaries, debates, and in the finer points of smear-campaign, Barack Obama keeps showing America how good he is. At getting beaten by a girl. A GIRL! How can he be expected to stand up to ruthless, cut-throat Islamic terrorists - who, according to scientific studies, beat girls all the time - when he's constantly getting his ass handed to him by a Breastified-American? Seriously, the dude needs to sneak the key to Michelle's testicular lock box out from underneath her pillow, strap on a pair, and cowboy up. Here are my suggestions for ways Obama can toughen up his image to improve his chances of having the honor of losing to a REAL man in November: * Claim that he once gazed up Fred Thompson's mighty visage without being turned into stone. * Point out to journalists asking tough questions that he knows both unrepentant terrorists and the journalists' home addresses. * Post a YouTube video of himself successfully de-candifying a baby (note to Obama: edit out the failed attempts before posting). * When whining about the unfairness of debate questions, do it with a Schwarzenegger accent. * Drop the Cosmo scrip. * Casually twirl a butterfly knife during stump speeches. * Surround himself with guys who make him look rugged by comparison, like cripples or interior decorators. * Kick a puppy and laugh. * Don't look at me like that. It worked for Hillary, didn't it? * Promise that if he's elected, he'll replace water-boarding with scorpion-boarding. * Film himself defeating a Spaniard, a Giant, and a Sicilian. PS. Check out the picture of Obama's new testosterone-powered campaign tour bus:
It Seems Like Genius, But I Think He's Just Cranky - IMAO Have you seen the racket McCain has going? Initially I dismissed it as just nutroots whining, but it is pretty sweet. Either a person makes an offensive statement about Obama or a group puts out an attack ad against him, McCain then denounces the person or ad, the statement or ad gets played over and over so everyone can see what McCain is offended by while McCain gets praised by everyone in the media for denouncing the attack. Of course, he upsets conservatives when it's a completely legitimate attacks he's denouncing, but the Republican primary already proved that no one cares what we think.
Could Obama attack Hilary back ?,Of course he can Just picture it,a black man attacking a white women.
Yannis, thank you lightening up a thread that definitely needs it. For someone whose happy theme is unity, change and hope Barack Obama is about as antithetic as one can get. His unity is the Marxist utopia of making everyone poor. His change is going further and further left. And his hope is dragging everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
So far Barack Obama has not played the race card - good for him. But will it last? As long as he is the perceived leader to win the Democrat nomination he has had no need. But now that Hillary is seeming to make an improbable comeback as serious questions about Obama's ability to beat John McCain arise, will he play the racism guilt card? Of course Obama himself will not say anything so foolish as blaming white racism for his electoral problems (then again maybe he is that stupid). It will be surrogates and those not directly tied to him that will make that case. But how will he respond? Will he be the "great uniter" he pretends to be and denounce them, or will he show his true colors that he learned from his black Archie Bunker mentor and let slip again as he did with his elite "bitter" and "cling" remark to likeminded elitists in San Francisco? I guess the real question is, will Barack Obama be able to continue with this facade as a untiter, or will his true self show forth (again), as a racist divider? Here is a column that explores this issue, albeit with a little more nuanced language. Obama's race talk off point http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2008/04/27/2008-04-27_obamas_race_talk_off_point.html
Well, well - guess who just threw Barack Obama under the bus? Yep, the black Archie Bunker preacher himself. So much for twenty years of mentorship: Wright's Voice Could Spell Doom for Obama http://blog.washingtonpost.com/roughsketch/2008/04/obamas_pastor_reignites_race_c.html