Gadfly once again assigns himself the the final arbiter on what is moral, decent & appropriate for discussion. That's like letting Goebbels arrange for a jewish wedding reception. Predictable and tragic.
Not quite. I was merely pointing to the moderator's own warning and subsequent lack of follow-through. It is, isn't it?
I know I'd be a fan of that option. As I said to an individual who PMd me on the discussion, threatening assassination of the President is ILLEGAL and HAS NO PLACE HERE. Using the word "assassination" in other context (unrelated to this discussion) or making the following quote (which was brought to my attention) ...a cancerous growth must be destroyed before it attacks the entire body, and the being perishes. [/QUOTE]