Excellent. Wish I could write so concisely. The Earths axis of rotation "nutates" or if you prefer, "precesses" causing variation in the how long the Sun-Earth vector impinges on the Northern Hemisphere (recall that the axis of rotation is inclined 23.5 degrees from the plane of the ecliptic). This variation is sufficient to disrupt the "Atlantic Conveyer" current which cycles warm water into the the north-most regions of the seas and displaces colder water towards the south. At points of time where the polar axis has precessed until it has its equatorial component pointing outward (away from the sun) the north has very long cold winters and some encroachment of ice towards the south, sometimes all the way into Europe. When at this time there is a simultaneous Solar Minimum the Earth has experienced an ice age which persists until either the solar flux increases or the equatorial component of the axis of rotation precesses around towards the sun. There was a time when I was at odds with you regarding the Treyvon Martin case and I said some things I now regret. You are clearly a thoughtful man and I see now that you are a truth-seeker. My apology is offered for my behavior during some of our previous interactions. I need to remind myself, daily, that it is important to not judge people hastily simply because they disagree with me. Salute.
I think all the fabricated data is wrong. When global warming promoters take datasets and filter out any of the stations and/or readings that do not support their perspective, and also add fake data points to create false impressions -- then there is a significant issue with the "science". At this point all the datasets typically used by global warming alarmists can not even pass a basic fraud detection algorithm.
You did not answer my question. Do you think that the multiple data sets graphically represented above are all wrong?