This week in the Religion of Piss

Discussion in 'Religion and Spirituality' started by TGregg, Jun 9, 2007.

  1. try harder lil' boy if it works at zionist skool... one day u'll realize thats the only place where it works
    :p :p :p
     
    #131     Jun 27, 2007
  2. That is because you are missing a very important point dddooo! You see, this campaign against Islam, carried by you and Tigger, two hard core zionists, has one objective and one objective only!!! To mobilize the Western masses to fight your war!

    I am sorry if I spoiled this opportunity for you but you and your lackey have to be exposed!!

    All of the sites that promote hates (ALL OF THEM) are manned by zionists. Name for name, all of them are zionists!

    You are attempting to charge sentiments against Muslims. When that is done, all you have to do is to cry like the little bitch you are and point them to another group that had a muslim majority!
    Do not mention your oppression. Do not mention your crimes and ethnic cleansing. focus on the fact that they are Muslims and understand why we commit these crimes against them.

    You have attacked everyone who exposed you and turned on them with a vengeance. It is you who is a disingenuous bastard, not me.

    Whenever the subject of the injustice committed against us arise, you use the Muslim card in an attempt to intimidate us and anyone who sees the truth.

    Shut the hell up zionist.
     
    #132     Jun 27, 2007
  3. Hey dddooo;

    Have you had a chance to read UNSCR 242?? We have debated on that one before!!!

    Just in case you forgot, here you go.

    U.N. Security Council Resolution 242
    November 22, 1967

    Following the June '67, Six-Day War, the situation in the Middle East was discussed by the UN General Assembly, which referred the issue to the Security Council. After lengthy discussion, a final draft for a Security Council resolution was presented by the British Ambassador, Lord Caradon, on November 22, 1967. It was adopted on the same day.
    This resolution, numbered 242, established provisions and principles which, it was hoped, would lead to a solution of the conflict. Resolution 242 was to become the cornerstone of Middle East diplomatic efforts in the coming decades.


    The Security Council,
    Expressing its continuing concern with the grave situation in the Middle East,

    Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every State in the area can live in security,

    Emphasizing further that all Member States in their acceptance of the Charter of the United Nations have undertaken a commitment to act in accordance with Article 2 of the Charter,



    Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:

    Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;
    Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force;

    Affirms further the necessity

    For guaranteeing freedom of navigation through international waterways in the area;
    For achieving a just settlement of the refugee problem;
    For guaranteeing the territorial inviolability and political independence of every State in the area, through measures including the establishment of demilitarized zones;

    Requests the Secretary General to designate a Special Representative to proceed to the Middle East to establish and maintain contacts with the States concerned in order to promote agreement and assist efforts to achieve a peaceful and accepted settlement in accordance with the provisions and principles in this resolution;

    Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Security Council on the progress of the efforts of the Special Representative as soon as possible.

    You want to doubt this one too??? How about doubting its source???

    http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Peace Pro...ce Process/UN Security Council Resolution 242


    You still insist you did not steal land???
    :D :D
     
    #133     Jun 27, 2007
  4. Wael, 2cents claim was that the entire land of Israel was stolen, not the occupied territories. Nice try though.

    As far as the territories are concerned, they are not stolen as they have not been annexed, they are indeed occupied as the war during which they were captured has not ended with a peace treaty. These lands are available to be exchanged for peace, recognition and security guarantees in full compliance with UN resolution 242. Too bad the arab response to the resolution was "No peace, no recognition and no negotiation with Israel".

    After the war, Israel approached its enemies with an offer to negotiate. The response: "No negotiations. No recognition. No peace." ... When Israel had peace partners, like Egypt, it achieved peace – and in exchange for land captured in the Six-Day War.
    http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcon...state_0617edi.ART.State.Edition1.432cd94.html
     
    #134     Jun 27, 2007
  5. Sure, it has nothing to do with Darfur, 9/11, Bali, Russian theater/school hostages etc... It has nothing to do with this either: Muslims killed 80 million hindus in 500 years. It's not about the executions of gays and flirting girls in Iran and Saudi Arabia, it's not about Taliban and Hamas.

    All muslim problems are caused by TGregg and myself. Thank you wael but you give us entirely too much credit.

    Try again wael, try to be more critical for once, try to look for muslim problems in Islam not Zionism, in muslim world's support for Osama and sheik Yasin, not in the western world's support for me and Tgregg. Good luck.
     
    #135     Jun 27, 2007
  6. sure, none of this absolutely none at all has anything to do with the US interference, financing, arming and training of terror groups and other covert actions in iran and the rest of the middle-east for the last 60+ years, the israeli massacres of arabs, land theft, false flag ops etc etc... nuttin' at all

    oooppps sorry i was reading from a zionist skoolbook...
     
    #136     Jun 27, 2007
  7. LOL, What does Bali have to do with the US, or terror attacks in India, Russia, Indonesia, Israel, Spain, London? What do riots in France and Denmark have to do with the US, or the violence in Lebanon?

    Let alone the fact that 99% of US involvement in the ME has been absolutely 100% legal according to all international norms, laws and standards. Osama Bin Laden did not declare jihad against the US because of Iran, he declared jihad in response to the presence of american troops in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait and our troops are there absolutely legally based on an invitation by legitimate governments of those countries.

    We've been at cold war with Russia for 50 years, frankly we've interfered in South/Latin American affairs much more often and far less legally than we ever have in the Middle East and I don't see any terrorism or suicide bombings there.

    So feel free to come up with as many absurd excuses as you'd like, most normal people will still see the common denominator of most of the violence in the world - Islam.
     
    #137     Jun 27, 2007
  8. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1502317&highlight=colors#post1502317

    i guess the land was just "there" then and a guy called dave who'd just landed from JewishAgency4PalestineLand http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Agency came around loftily and just said, well, why don' i call this lil' 'hood israel??

    hey? schlomo, watcha say? not a good name? whaaaattt? can't hear ya.... sum arabs r complaining????? hahaha, good ole schlomo!!!
     
    #138     Jun 27, 2007
  9. :p :p :p its almost like u believe that stuff... then why is it that the rest of the world actually doesn't? hey lil' boy, what does yr skoolbook say on that one? c'mon, read out loud, and don't blush no matter what BS may be in there... good boy!
     
    #139     Jun 27, 2007
  10. Exactly, finally you're getting it. I showed you the numbers in my previous posts, the land was a desert, it was virtually unpopulated in 1900, a couple of hundred thousand residents, mostly nomads - a drop in the bucket. And they did not own the land either, the land belonged to the Turkish and later British empire

    In the first half of the 20th century both arabs and jews migrated to Palestine en masse, the arabs had as much/little right to migrate to Palestine as the jews did. The idea to split the land in two countries was absolutely fair and correct.
     
    #140     Jun 27, 2007