This Profits/Return Exceeds the Historic Winning Runs

Discussion in 'Risk Management' started by bearice, Apr 27, 2011.

  1. MarkBrown

    MarkBrown

    i call scam on it i will guarantee that if you had those returns you would have more money than 110m and your min would be lots larger. you can make these claims because in the us they would put you in jail.

    mark brown
     
    #11     May 7, 2011
  2. Madoff $65 Billion scam has scared worldwide people. Some people think all long-term profitable investments are scams/fraud. Because of Madoff, other honest investment professionals are suffering. 35% per annum is stable excellent long-term profits.

    Many USA investors have written to me and they are disappointed that USA residents are not lalowed to invest. They have money but cannot invest with us. I am trying seriously hard to help USA investors invest with our company from alternative legal ways.
     
    #12     May 7, 2011
  3. MarkBrown

    MarkBrown

    i would love to know how barons investment works out btw what would the site sale for. it would be better to sell it now while he isnt desperate.

    the other thing is i would not have come on a silly place full of clowns (see stock777 13,000 useless post) like et and ask a serious question about some fantastic money manager that could make me billions. i would have just used him and kept my mouth shut if it was all that great. there must be some suspicions or doubts about this manager.

    m
     
    #13     May 9, 2011
  4. Personally, I looked into it and wanted to invest a while back but couldn't because I am a US citizen. If it was a full fledged scam they would take US money in a heartbeat no questions asked .

    Bearice, I think you guys would attract more money than you could handle if you posted audited results but I would like to see them on here if you are making these claims and truly are trying to raise money.
     
    #14     May 9, 2011
  5. Biggest proof/evidence that our managed forex company is 100% legitmate/genuine:

    These are segregated client accounts and they have the best possible protection level from the point of view of law. Investors will have to open a managed forex account with Switzerland based forex manager and deposit minimum of $20,000 which will be traded in forex by the forex manager. This means that the client/investor opens a personal account in his name with the broker. Investors can withdraw their money anytime they want. Investors have 100% control over their money/investment.

    Reply from CEO (Forex manager):

    Indeed I have 36 years of experience in the meantime. I began trading for myself in the age of 16 years old. My first experience as account manager I made in 1980 in regards of 3rd party trading.

    My first fully automated trading system I developed in the year 1986 with historical data back to the year 1975. Data we still have. I build up my first own company in year 1990 with professional system trading for 3rd parties.

    Every month investors that are not invested with our forex company they lose statistically 2 % - 3 % growth on their capital. With the compounded interest effect this is soon a big amount. Furthermore they lose the opportunity of a perfect diversification as well as safety and liquidity on an investment.

    Advise them if they know any other company managing their account exclusively on the basis of positive performance. No volume incentives and/or pip spread enlargement. No management fees.

    This is the clearest sign that we do avoid any conflict of interest between the investor and the account manager. Our unique target is to do a serious work to have long term clients with an exciting long term growth on their accounts.

    It seems pretty unfair like some arrogant investors play around with you. Keep cool and never give up.

    Elitetrader member:

    "It all depends on the size of your account. If you're trading over 10 million then 1%-2% monthly is ok. If you are trading between $50,000 - $100,000 you should be making 50%-100% per year".
     
    #15     May 10, 2011
  6. Bearice has requested me to post this.

    Year 2000 -- + 27% (August to December)

    Year 2001 -- + 80%

    Year 2002 -- + 29%

    Year 2003 -- + 51%

    Year 2004 -- + 9%

    Year 2005 -- + 19%

    Year 2006 -- + 39%

    Year 2007 -- + 10%

    Year 2008 -- + 36%

    Year 2009 -- + 39%

    Year 2010 -- + 42%

    This is for Daily data system and minimum investment is $100,000.
     
    #16     Jun 12, 2011
  7. More information from Bearice.

    April 2011 profit is +17%

    March 2011 profit is +2.5%

    Feburary 2011 profit is +13%

    January 2011 profit is +2%

    May 2011 loss is - 8%

    This is for combined data system and minimum investment is $40,000.

    Bearice is allowed to post in Politics and Religion and chit chat only. He cannot post in other sections of elitetrader.
     
    #17     Jun 12, 2011
  8. MarkBrown

    MarkBrown

    this is such bs i guess i should believe it's happening after all it's et..

    quit posting return numbers and start posting independent 3rd party phone numbers of auditors who can be contacted for verification. i will wire 100 million if it checks out but i can tell you "but wait" let's get barron to tell us it's a scam after he loses all his money. this is some crazy $hit and i am shocked the general crowd has not run this thread in the ground already, the entire et staff must be in on the ponzi scheme.
     
    #18     Jun 21, 2011
  9. When the future is uncertain then daily trading is the best source of good profits. Do not go for long-term investment because there is no guarantee that world companies will have sales. Less sales means less profits so loss on long term investment.

    Forex trading is 100% daily trading. There is no long term investment in forex trading. So forex is the best investment when future is uncertain.

    Forex trading trading transactions are $4 Trillion every day.

    Read this:

    $2,568 Trillion Revenue. But No Money

    In 2007, when the economy was still doing fine, The Federal Govt took in $2,568 TRILLION in revenue and we spent $2,629 Trillion for a deficit of $161 Trillion.

    Now a mere 4 years later, we are spending $3.7 TRILLION while taking in only $2.1 trillion. For a deficit of $1.6 Trillion. OR 10 times the deficit of FOUR YEARS AGO. Who knew that Bush would be "the good old days?" Revenue is down because the economy is down. spending is up because we have a Socialist, Giant Government believing president in the White House and a Democratic Congress that loves to spend other peoples money. Now the face of Congress is changing. If the government would get out of the way of business and SHOW business that the government wants them to do well. Mainly by reducing regulations on business and taxes on business since the taxes in the USA between Federal and States are the highest of any nation in the world. Then business could and would begin to expand. And TAXES on the rich and everyone else were exactly the same in 2007 as they were in 2010. Now since obama and the Democrats extended and increased to tax cuts, taxes are lower NOW than they were in Bush's time. Individual taxes, not business taxes.

    So if we could get spending back to where it was in 2007 and get revenue just $200 billion above where it was in 2007, we would HAVE a balanced budget.

    USA needs to cut $16 Trillion over 10 years to balance the budget. Is this true?

    That comes to $1.6 Trillion every year. How many jobs will be lost in USA?

    $4 trillion over 10 years is a joke. The best way to save jobs is to reduced the salaries of high paid employees by 50%.

    Salaries of government people such as federal reserve and bankers should be reduced by 90%.

    USA cannot spend more money unless debts have been repaid or replaced by real money.

    This means every year there will be $1.6 Trillion less spending from USA. Reduce pay, reduce benefits, and reduce retirement plans and job loss means less income for USA people. Less income means less sales and less profits for private and public sector companies.

    So there will be job-loss in private sectors and public sectors.

    How will companies pay taxes when there is less profits or no profits?

    How will people pay taxes when there is reduction is salaries/wages and job-loss?

    Basically Tax collection for USA government will fall to its lowest level. Thanks to who?

    Withdraw and take back presidential plane Air force one and 412 limousines from Obama and his clowns.

    Withdraw USA army from Afghanistan immediately and end the war.

    Everybody is welcome to post their suggestions here to save USA jobs and cut $16 Trillion to balance the budget.

    ------------------------------

    House Republican budget negotiators have abandoned plans to pursue a massive $4 trillion, 10-year deficit reduction package in the face of stiff Republican opposition to any plan that would increase taxes as part of the deal.

    House Speaker John Boehner informed President Barack Obama on Saturday that a smaller agreement of about $2 trillion was more realistic.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43695394/ns/politics-white_house/

    U.S. Debt Actually $200 Trillion?

    "The Government is lying about the amount of debt. It is engaging in Enron accounting," said Laurence Kotlikoff, an economist at Boston University and co-author of The Coming Generational Storm: What You Need to Know about America's Economic Future.

    Mr Kotlikoff says the debt is actually $200 Trillion.

    Mr Moylan says the number is likely about $60 Trillion.

    "The problem is we're seeing an explosion in spending," added Andrew Moylan, director of government affairs for the National Taxpayers Union.

    In 1980, the debt - the accumulated red ink incurred by the Federal Government - was $US909 billion

    THE actual figure of the US' national debt is much higher than the official sum of $US13.4 trillion ($14.3 trillion) given by the Congressional Budget Office, according to analysts cited on Sunday by the New York Post.

    http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=10626

    Wal-Mart: Our shoppers are 'running out of money'

    Wal-Mart (Fortune 500), which averages 140 million shoppers weekly to its stores in the United States, is considered a barometer of the health of the consumer and the economy. Wal-Mart's core shoppers are running out of money much faster than a year ago due to rising gasoline prices, and the retail giant is worried, CEO Mike Duke said Wednesday.

    Wal-Mart has struggled with seven straight quarters of sales declines in its stores

    With food prices rising, Duke said Wal-Mart is charging customers more for some fresh groceries while reducing prices on other merchandise such as electronics.

    "We're seeing core consumers under a lot of pressure," Duke said at an event in New York. "There's no doubt that rising fuel prices are having an impact." "Purchases are really dropping off by the end of the month even more than last year," Duke said. "This end-of-month [purchases] cycle is growing to be a concern.

    http://money.cnn.com/2011/04/27/news/companies/walmart_ceo_consumers_under_pressure/index.htm
     
    #19     Jul 23, 2011