Man are you (and those who liked your post) naive! Pay back lol. How about OrangeTard paying back all those contractors over the decades he stiffed and/or declared bankruptcy (6 times!!!!!!!!) and/or sued and sued till they paid him just to go the eff away? In order to cut down on fraud they need to spend more money investigating and convicting some to deter, somewhat, others from doing the same. Not just grandstand and have the right-wing-nut media get in a tizzy. Alakazam there is fraud. We found it. Pay up. We need the $1 trillion so hand it over.
Actually I don't know why I bothered to reply to TrAndy2022 ..... a German Dummkopf. WTF does he even care? Or for that matter the Afrikaner (Illegal Alien) Musk. He doesn't have enough of our money?
Yes, I understand that the FED has both types of auditing... but I , like many other citizens interested in the exact state of the FEDs books, want a SPECIAL AUDITOR... like sometimes congress appoints / hires a SPECIAL PROSECUTOR to investigate their own in house congressional lawyers... a Special Auditor would investigate the FED's Auditors. To find out if they are cooking their books or not... I have been a citizen of the US for over 40+ years and the LIES the USA Government, FED definitely Included, have only gotten worse by the decade.
Since you boys are reading these days. 12 years ago... https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...0b89f6-40be-11e3-a751-f032898f2dbc_story.html
""Listen Sonny I Was Banging Soldiers In The US British 1812 War When I Received My First SS Check"""
You posted in your response to me: You say they did not contact anyone, are you dead sure ? Whereas I posted: ...no one at Zerohedge thought to interview anyone at the S.S. administration with in-depth knowledge of Social Security computer files. Ideally, I would have have including the word "apparently" to modify my statement above, because in point of fact I don't know whether Zerohedge contacted S.S. asking them for comment on their story. If you were a responsible Journalist doing the ZH story, would you have contacted S.S. to get their response to the story before you published it? I would hope so. If you did, wouldn't you mention that in your article and also tell us the outcome of that contact? I would hope so. [See the New York times for many examples of how responsible reporting should work (usually).] I'm left to choose between two possibilities: a) Zerohedge contacted S.S. for comment but didn't mention it in their article, or b) Zerohedge did not contact S.S. for comment. I treated Zerohedge as a responsible reporter when I assumed that if they had contacted S.S. they would have mentioned that. I should know better. Zerohedge is not a responsible and accurate reporter. They are a source of both disinformation and distortion.