The part where he didn't refute my argument. The reason he didn't is because he knows its true. He can call me all the names he wants, but name calling it not going to prove your point. It just shows me that you don't have a leg to stand on in your argument. Typically one refers to name calling as the last line of defense. When they have nothing else to offer. So I take it that is all he has left. hence, my point proven. Thank you for playing. Come again.
So, you believe that "irrational to caricature" is the same as a "fuckhead"? Or at least feel the same way about the two? When someone says that you're "irrational" that in it self gives you automatic proof that you're right and the rest are wrong? Very interesting.
Sulong, when one states their opinion you can call them irrational. But when one states facts, you either need to refute those facts as wrong or you can't make an argument. If I say the sun rises in the east and then you call me irrational, well how does that make sense? It doesn't right? If I say the market was down today and you say that I'm irrational then that also does not make sense unless the market was up. But if I say something like all liberals are stupid, well then you could make an argument for me being irrational. But when I state three facts that are documented all over the place and you call me irrational, that just doesn't add up. Either tell me my facts are wrong and prove it, or say nothing at all. Do you understand now?
Would you fuck a sheep? I mean, if you were a sheep and she was coming on to you in her baa, baa, shaky, shaky way... wood you fuck 'er?
Hey, I missed this post. TM,whether you like it or not, the USofA did not give a fuck about the jews before or during WWII, so come off your high pony. Not until after the war did jews become important, and only then because of politics. read your history book, you sniveler.
This is happening in the good old USA. Childrens lives are being destroyed and in some cases they are being killed. It's all motivated by greed and much of the market is HERE. It's horrible and sick and certainly has nothing to do with socialism. In fact this is the sort of thing libertarians tend to defend, if indirectly. But this is not victimless crime. If you can read this without being outraged, you're probably a sociopath. ges http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/25/magazine/25SEXTRAFFIC.html
Ges, Didn't read that link. Didn't want to bother signing up for the New York Times. But I think your missing the point here. The topic of this thread is not about pedophilia per se or the exploitation of children. That is certainly awful, but I am talking about the Swedish government here. Sure there are sickos everywhere, but let me post this quote again. "In contrast with most other countries, animal sex is not illegal in Sweden. It was decriminalized in 1944 in connection with the decriminalization of homosexual sex." We are talking about the swedish government here. The US government would never legalize bestiality. This is my point!!!!!! Why do you people continue to avoid the issue here.
Do I care if someone has sex with an animal? No. Do I think it is twisted? Yes. Do I think the government should prevent people from doing it in the privacy of their own home? No.