Can you cite statistics that are normalized for societal inequalities? It’s nature after all so this should be easy to do. For example a study showing women in leadership positions in Saudi Arabia. That’s clearly proof that they lack the same leadership skills as men.
Any practical man will know that nobody is equal. Some make more money, some make less. Some are thin, and others are fat. Some are smart, some are dumb and the list goes on. These are not ideologies, these are facts. Your 'everyone is equal' is actually an ideology. Show me an example where women are better than men (in an organically competitive environment). Sports? Men are better Chess? Men are better Motorsports? Men are better Cooking? Men are better Business? Men are better Investing? Men are better Biologically women are made to nurture and men to hunt. So, both masculinity and feminity are needed for civilizations to go on.
Since these are indisputable facts, you can present data to support them, normalized for societal inequalities. This should be an easy task: you are a man after all.
I think all of us know these facts already. But I will drop one example just for the sake of it. As of March 2017, the top rated woman is Yifan Hou, with rank of 117 and a rating of 2649. The 100th ranked player is Evgeniy Najer (male), with a rating of 2659. Therefore, currently it is true that no women are in the 100 top rated active players, although historically Yifan Hou had a higher rating and then appeared on the open list of top 100 players. https://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml?list=women Here are some quotes from the top male chess player: Bobby Fischer once said women are “terrible chess players”, later opining that “I don’t think they should mess into intellectual affairs; they should keep strictly to the home”. Garry Kasparov, said that “there is real chess and women’s chess”. Chess is “not for women. … Women are weaker fighters,” world champion Garry Kasparov “Men are hardwired to be better chess players than women,” vice president of the world chess federation FIDE and grandmaster Nigel Short. Conclusion: Women can't compete with men therefore we have to create a separate category for them to compete. Not only in chess but in other sports too. In business too with diversity hire and quota. It's like heavy weight vs light weight. Note: I am in no way a misogynist, I am merely presenting the facts.
Chess??? I love the game... But it's a sausage fest, a sexist misogynistic sausage nerd fest, historically and today. Women were (and maybe still are) not allowed to play in the same tournament as men, and it's not a physical sport. We still have only women tournaments and best women price, a bit like miss universe sexist crap. Wired differently, or cognitive bias? Judit Polgar beat 9 world champions, including Kasparov and Spassky, at 17. Fisher? I respect the man, but he probably had sex once or twice in his life, if he had it. If being very clever or good an anything meant no women involved, damn I am happy being crazy stupid. Nature might not care about correctness, but it's a female... Madre natura, and she is smarter and more powerful than any men created male god.
You’ve proven the societal inequalities pretty well with this post. Now the statistical data please…. This shouldn’t be hard for you. Men are good at math.
Yes, this is a majority-male site and frankly, I'd prefer it stay that way. No one wants to hear that bullshit about the lack of female traders and all of that other leftist bullshit that comes up when certain groups are present.
why would you reject a woman trader on this site? To my knowledge this is a trading forum. Not a male trading forum. I thought conservatives didn't care about gender or race. But apparently they do in a big way.