atticus, i don't know where to even start..there are so many places to note about you. granted beu is nuts, but so are you. in all the years you have been here you never ever posted a legit screen shot (key word: "legit")...all the old timers realize it too. i give you credit for getting away with this for so many years. my point is..you do not trade much if at all and never ever made money. discredit my one lot post all you want..the fact remains that what i say is true as no where will you ever find anything other than words to back up your assertion you are a profitable trader. don't bother to try to offer up a thread, etc..i am aware you know exactly how to bs your way through that too. sure you have some serious knowledge regarding trade structure; but too bad you never made any money. i hope someday people realize what a scam you are too. you definitely do NOT over trade options, lol.
After reading though this thread I was concerned because I've known Mr. Schamp for years. So I called him on the phone this morning. The reference to the Royals is incorrect. An old financial adviser to one of the minor family members was a student many years ago. That was the extent of it. Mr. Schamp gave Mr. Wolinsky his entire method to test. There wasn't a charge. Mr. Schamp recognized that Mr. Wolinsky was a bit of a savant and that there wasn't a better person to severely test the math behind it. I can only imagine Mr. Wolinsky will be testing the software as well. Picking on Mr. Wolinsky only publicly displays the childish bullying tactics and obvious smallness of character of those participating. Mr. Wolinsky has a handicap but is still far more of a man than all of you attacking him. If you tried this on the street in front of the public someone would kick the crap out of you so I guess that makes you so much more to do it on the net, huh? Mr. Schamp isn't giving away his method he is giving away the opportunity to test it. He has been the brunt of numerous attacks over the years from individuals that make their comments solely on assumptions and not facts so he figures he will allow people to openly test his method and allow them to prove it to themselves that it works or it doesn't. I'm on that list and waiting for the release later this month to test it. I've tested his theories for a couple years with success. If his software is as good as his theories, I'll be a happy man. If they are crap, I'll be the first to tell you. For the one poster that says that Mr. Schamp has no one to stand up for his method, I'm in a group of about 40 traders that would disagree with you. I'll not be posting any more in this thread. I prefer to hold discussions with people familiar or experienced with the topic they are talking about and in this thread that only seems to be Mr. Wolinsky. Mr. Wolinsky, I would not continue to post in this thread and bring yourself down to the extremely low level of attacks aimed at you. Be confident that you know what you know and let the others stew in their own sty. Ignorance is bliss and your attackers are one supremely euphoric bunch.
We didn't know he was mentally ill. If he had stopped talking about his grandeur and godliness in every post, nobody would bite...But he is just too annoying.
Hi Bill, So you embellished a bit about the Royals? So you taught some dude that's a broker to some Earl? So how did Beau make the inference about a specific $investment? That's one big hole you're digging, ProfLogic.
okok, so you're clipping some handicapped guy for thousands of dollars for some bogus volume and ergodic plug-in? So the $5MM investment from the Royals is OFF? Another correction: Beau stated that he (Beau) was mentally-ill.