This Forum overtrades options

atticus · Dec 1, 2011

Quote from bwolinsky:

Auto-spell check. Look again.
More...

But now you have me wondering about his compression. Beau, you're certifiable. Bill, if you're reading, he's doing irreparable harm to your scam.

atticus · Dec 1, 2011

Quote from bwolinsky:

What the fuck's it to you?

All of his theses verified by me, and I've reached my own conclusions. He had practically no input except for giving me his code and a humongous database that I guarantee is several hundred gigabytes LARGER than yours, and so's my dick!

He gave me the manual and student version of his code he uses to teach. I get an extended free trial with no obligation to buy, but if CL's making $4000 on $4000 of margin PER WEEK GODDAMIT then no fucking way, you, cocksucker! He's got the most exceptional trading program I've ever seen, and if people from Britain's royal family are forking over $5 million so they can keep being the worlds wealthiest land owners, then DRACHMA! Do you know what Drachma is? Cause I will have more of it than probably anyone who has participated in this thread, and good thing Bill isn't here because then I couldn't say that.

That's proof to me and if you want to keep thinking I'm not the smartest person in this room well then you'll just have to suck it and your losing stock position through next monday.

You've proven you don't know what you're talking about, and obviously don't know how to trade, probably subscribing to random ass vendors with no edge and no backtests. That's what sets me apart from trader and you, the wannabe. I tell you none of his students know how to program, or very few, which is why I have backtests and not indicators. Since you're too stupid to even comprehend what that entails you will be going on ignore if you mention him deceiving me, because it is you who is foolish enough to think I can't verify his own results with versions I've written.

So, shut the fuck up! You will lose your bet, but it's really a ploy to see if I'll tell you what I get for my problems, and that is none of your business. You are a terrible human being if you don't comprehend how many things I am capable of.
More...

Is anyone else aroused?! Sorry, internal monologue/soliloquy.

The story about the Royals is truly comical and over the top. I would check your pockets Beau, as you are reaaaaally being taken for a ride.

ProfLogic, you're a real fcuking loser to scam this kid like this. The British Royal family, eh? I wonder what Wayne State would think of this bullshit.

bwolinsky · Dec 1, 2011

Quote from atticus:

But now you have me wondering about his comprehension. Beau, you're certifiable. Bill, if you're reading, he's doing irreparable harm to your scam.
More...

You're really nuts if you think this. Looney toons, you sure as heck are! With a capital LOON!

bwolinsky · Dec 1, 2011

Quote from atticus:

Is anyone else aroused?! Sorry, internal monologue/soliloquy.

The story about the Royals is truly comical and over the top. I would check your pockets Beau, as you are reaaaaally being taken for a ride.

ProfLogic, you're a real fcuking loser to scam this kid like this. The British Royal family, eh? I wonder what Wayne State would think of this bullshit.
More...

How old do you think I am, ASSICUS? I'm an adult bitch. I own an RIA, A CTA, AND A GODDAM STOCK EXCHANGE SO SHUT THE FUCK UP! JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP! JUST THE FUCK UP!

Riffraffpatrol · Dec 1, 2011

Quote from bwolinsky:

How old do you think I am, ASSICUS? I'm an adult bitch. I own an RIA, A CTA, AND A GODDAM STOCK EXCHANGE SO SHUT THE FUCK UP! JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP! JUST THE FUCK UP!
More...

Lol psychotic meltdown... I love it....

What an idiot... Priceless...

Keep the laughs comin bwego

joneog · Dec 1, 2011

Quote from bwolinsky:

I'm an adult bitch.
More...

commas, like trix, are for kids

bwolinsky · Dec 1, 2011

Quote from joneog:

commas, like trix, are for kids
More...

Just as we get more reactions, immediately, there isn't any commentary over what I've written. Go write over 1,000 words in a post. I dare you, jone.

Petty nitpickiness is stupid. Deal with the subject matter and not as a stupid english teacher worrying about grammar rather than the substance of the conversation.

Why don't you tell me which word isn't in the dictionary?

ammo · Dec 2, 2011

Quote from bwolinsky:

No, because anyone who doubts how robust his system is when it has all the bells and whistles doesn't understand Statistical Analysis and Capital Management Arbitrage, and they sure as fuck don't know anything about Financial Science.

Furthermore, knowledge about probability and statistics is not enough. You must mix with game theory and especially the idea of expected value that gets confused with expectancy because they aren't exactly interchangeable but very easy to understand.

I have a minor in mathematics in addition to doing research that is beyond your comprehension, answering questions about what effects the average 40 year olds income is effected by, because the most significant variable in this regression is IQ, by far, incidental family histories, race, sex, and several other variables I'd love to redo, because it was an excellent paper, but the teacher didn't like that I used a technique that would actually calculate the real dollar amounts of each variable, rather than using the logarithm of their annual total income which is why he gave me a bad grade even though I did explain what function I'd used in SAS he still claimed that I had violated the basic assumptions of linear regression when I did not, and I was furious when that professor wrote a more than 2 page response to that 20 page paper just to decide on others submitted by much less tech savvy people. Again, your iq at age 40 is worth $250-260 per percentile on the ASVAB. The other research project determined using binary logit what the probability was of whether you would have more than 3 jobs before age 40, and I liked that one, too, using similar datasets but managing to spit out excel formatted files to work with STATA, which was a strange course in Empirical Analysis having more to do with the professor's research than as a way to actually teach Empirical which was beyond Econometrics.

This doesn't give me pause at all, because if you want to know that I just have it. And when I say have it, I mean numbers are all I see and all the computer sees. My automaton is just as senile as the next one, but the human variable doesn't make a dam bit of difference if you are doing the same things it does and with greater or same expectancy, because I know for a fact that his program is worth financing a group of investors to buy out, but he was already offered a $10 million buy offer with 50% profit sharing and still didn't take it.

I know how to analyze for robustness, but what you don't seem to understand is that I am completely independent of him, but after seeing that code November 23rd, 2009, I knew my life had changed. So I got around to spending time with the program and I loved it! So much so that I founded my RIA and became a CTA because the programs were that impressive.

Now if you think that I've just spent money with him, he gets annoyed at me asking questions about illiquid stocks that aren't in his top 10 and he's a good teacher, so if you think he was spouting bullshit like Jack Hershey BILL SCHAMP IS NOT JACK HERSHEY AT ALL! PERIOD. PERIOD. PERIOD. COMMADOT...CC

...

...

So you still think I don't believe him? Or know that his program his works? Fuck you! Why am I even answering these questions. It's like the liars who claim not have had any losing trades in two years. There are wins and losses, but the profit factors are greater than 20 in nearly all of his backtests, with less than 0.5% drawdowns, now what's wrong with understanding he wouldn't actually give you the full version but could use demonstration code he developed to teach people how to trade, and it is very wholesome and noble. Don't think he's a dishonest man, or unethical. He's a genius, and he has the highest respect that I have ever had for any man, or mentor, and it's a close second with my new PhD from Stanford who was also a mentor, instructing me in informal independent studies on John Nash's Equilibrium and sort of taught me topology which he wasn't as fascinated by its implications to physics as I was, but I know I've seen the core of the sun, and I know how to create cold fusion even if I do not have the mathematics. I can explain the theory and that's all. But rather than assuming because there isn't anything flashy about romper rooms that have traders who may be doing live trades Bill Schamp has eaten his cooking past 9 figures, and as long as you respect the fact that he's not manipulating me, I think this is a great point for anyone to understand before they issue stupid responses and questions about things I already know the answer to, but if your intention is to doubt the method, look at a fucking chart yourself. Read what I've written here last night to summarize his theories of Price Physics. Look at a chart and then come tell me if you don't trade better for it.

Jack Hershey is a fraud, and works in so many linear regressions in his charts as to obviously be curve fits. That isn't what Bill Schamp has, and as far as that goes I want him to come back. He didn't deserve to have a loser think he could ever get past his triple layer encryptions, which are impossible to hack no matter if you have the best hacker in the universe you won't ever get the real thing, but you can demonstrate to yourself that the method works, it is sound, and if you doubt me, then you are doubting whether I've been able to produce stellar results with the codes, and I have. I just see that his other indicators make the theory complete, robust, and by far the most accurate tool you could ever want to use to trade.

I am not delusional and I am not being deceived by him. You will notice a stellar improvement in my trading when I have his program. Even now, though, I wouldn't be anywhere as far as hoping to be a succesful CTA without trying my own versions of his algorithms out just to find they're curve fitted crap, because of the use of genetic optimizations. He has a way to make this consistent across datasets, and for that every dollar of nobel prize is worthless if it means he must disclose his real methods outside of what he distributes to students who he knows have shared files he's given against his wishes as well as the fact that just for subscribing to his newsletter you will get an enormous database and if you didn't have his code, Multicharts would be a toy, but he's put effort into partnering with them and I've had the same problems with their attitudes about technical support.

In short, Kevin, believe me, that program is worth every dollar, and why he offers a free trial, but you must learn to trade by reading his manual, and in my opinion his rational for giving me that was because he saw somebody that needed what he had, and I am sincerely grateful to him for letting me be one of his last student mentoring relationships. I'm at the point to just sit down at a computer for hours, and wait for it to make an oscillation with so much potential profitability that if I have to tell you that my curve fits work just as well, it's not exactly true. They are curve fits, but they work most of the time going forward, and because his program Sentinel 4 is complete, I urge any financial advisor interested in trading futures to use it.

No, no pause. I've only seen consistency for over 2 years from him, in addition to all the research whereas I started trading 11/7/11 funding accounts with the minimum amount required to be a leader for the World Cup. I can't say anything more than that I just know. Exactly as Bud Fox would. It is a bit of insider knowledge, but for those insiders, you will reap so much excessive profits that he even asked me how much is enough?

The answer is:

Two hundred fifty six thousand six hundred twenty five dollars per day in salary with profit sharing for performance. That's how much fucking drachma there is if you listen to him. So holier than though, how great thou art, none is better than Price Physics, none as grand, or as holy and sacred. You have my word you will not disappointed if you try him out, but I know by writing this it will mean fewer copies will be available.

You see his student code, not Price Sentinel. A holy grail it is, and it will sustain you forever as long as its secrets are not dilluted by excessive trading, and he understands that perfectly, that I have no idea how few or how many he'll give, but that I will be one of the ones who has it, and I feel for those who won't ever get a chance. He's reached the end of his teaching career and wants to focus on trading reaching over 10 figures in 10 years. So he does have those aspirations, and I fully expect him to attain them.
More...

i was going to put up the" lighten up francis" clip from youtube,but thought it better if you watched the whole movie..you take yourself a little or way too serious... http://10starmovies.com/Watch-Movies-Online/Stripes_1981/

TraDaToR · Dec 2, 2011

In 2-3 years from now, Kate will be cheating on William with Beau. Girls always end up figuring where the money comes from and follow it.

Rollerblading, marching band, cold fusion, weed futures, Owning a stock exchange, partnership with ICE platform developpers, reverse double dutch auction, high speed chase with cops, mental hospital, grey aliens, levitation, Jesus, Cadillac Escalade, Rims, British Royal family, doing a married woman with your brother, Trading Cup owner signature and a lot more... If you are just joining us, stay tuned. I hope his parents won't ever find this thread.

Martinghoul · Dec 2, 2011

WOW! Just ... WOW.