I'm not saying he knows anything about trading, but what he's explaining has scientific basis which is a much harder argument to make than simply making those arguments. He was implying the periodic waves of torsion fields create these cycles and similarities in history effecting our evolution. You've still got to wonder why they look almost identical, and he said that it was due to this cyclicality, and I think it's unquestionable that he's probably right given the more than 3 hours it took to completely watch the videos, which I don't think you have watched anything but maybe the first 30 minutes, which doesn't bring you to his conclusions that are a summary of scientific research that supports his theses..
Not crude, quantum mechanics. I saw the video and they hardly look identical. He's an unwashed loon doing the Omaha Sheraton conference circuit. Unquestionably probably right? I have nothing against Cayce, but much of what he proposed was utter horseshit. Re: age of the pyramids is a prime example.
Well, I don't think it was about quantum mechanics. He was taking empirical experiments, basic ones, that had been done by NASA and Chinese Astronauts so by the end he shows the effect of space euphoria and how that made these enormously large plants by virtue of the fact that they were taken into space and initiated out of that euphoria growing way beyond typical size for such plants that hadn't been taken into space on rockets.
Wow, this thread just gets weirder and weirder. It has long ceased to have anything to do with options, over traded or otherwise.
I mean if you think it happened yesterday or one day you wake up floating in concious reality just to start spouting off stories about it and still believe what I'm saying is a hallucination to keep my ssd, you're wrong. It happened, and I was aware of it. That's all. It doesn't effect my trading strategies either.
An old thread that still makes me roll on the floor laughing. I've ignored substantially most of the last 3 pages, but I wanted to have the final word. It should be obvious who is on ignore. <b><i>This Thread Contains the Best Quant Humor of All Time!</b></i> http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=194979&perpage=6&pagenumber=1
Archin, when I have a point to make I will make it, and I type extremely fast. Don't confuse ranting with personal attacking, because there are very good points I made there, that don't qualify as a rant because it isn't overly emotional, and just because someone is saying more than 5 paragraphs doesn't mean they aren't making valid points or that it should be dismissed because due to length that makes it a rant. That's wrong, and you're wrong if you think that's a rant. It's well documented now what my opinions on most options strategies are, so send less money to the broker and make directional or hedging decisions as insurance, but don't use a strangle, or an iron condor, or any other that requires you to bet for moves that would take away from the profit of the other. That's what I'm saying, and quoting that just makes me have to re-explain the entire thread so these issues were explained so please read all of this before issuing an allegation that I was ranting there or trade while I'm ranting. No, I trade when I have orders to place, and I'm very cautious about not taking discretionary trades ever. Ever. Especially in options.