OMG. Reading BoWo posts will suck the IQ points out of you faster than...ol' Jack Hershey! We'll all be dumber than dog dirt soon...
Explain to me what you're not getting? The theory of economic profit and financial science is what Warren Buffet uses to calculate value.
scalar conversion fractal mathematics theoretically derived factors.. pyramid ial combin atorial..sounds a lot like bullashevits shitsappotamus so far...number crunching might be more convincing..go for singles on your b.s., to many want to be home run strikeouts,you will lose your audience in the 2nd sentence of the 1 st paragraph,the folks you are trying to rob have money because they know how to hang on to it,they won't listen to you if you haven't got their attention.. i wouldn't even ask you what it meant,out of fear that you might try to explain it to me
Ignorance and informality are typical of the apathetic. Learning CFA material is valuable, and if you don't see where it fits then you don't have the requisite background knowledge. A problem anybody who is not a CFA charterholder or candidate will have when they read or listen to Financial Science. And the win percentages at 70% was what you even suggested, so good thing I already have that.
Oh no! Woe is me! I guess it's all over for me then? Seeing as how I am not a CFA charter holder, I guess I just don't have what it takes to comprehend this whole Financial Science thing. Should I hand back my pnl and quit my job right now?
3 out of 100 will get you,the other 97 ,you might as well talk to your mule,that means you waste 97% of opportunity to garner backing,ignorant enough for ya,dumb it down
That wasn't the point. The information is geniuinely useful. Despite the reactions there hasn't been any criticism that has anything at all to do with that lecture. Only pissing from afar as I heard a graphic designer state whenever his designs make it into public display. There isn't anything critiqued or discussed, thus nothing but useless banter and irrelevant responses. It's obvious no one wants to analyze because it wasn't in their textbooks wherever they went to school or even if they went to school. It's certainly not at a secondary educational grade level but is intended for people with post secondary and post-graduate or graduate research experience. (At least I'm not telling you I trade based on which color Jim Cramer's Tie is, or use the color wheel to determine when to put my 10 lot ES on).
The difference between quantitative stock analysts, system developers, brokers, investment advisors and CTA's is the same difference as that between Quantum Phsyicists, Particle Phsycisits, Nuclear Scientists, Nuclear Research Scientists, and any teacher they might have had in the fourth grade. Night and day. A CTA is way more advanced than any stock, etf, mutual fund, or otherwise investment advisory service that doesn't trade commodity futures. The CFA credential is also gold standard financial knowledge, dwarfing stupid ass cfp's, and I don't consider it an exaggeration when I tell you that the CFP isn't even at eye level with the level of knowledge a CFA charterholder has.