Is that immunity based on statue or decision? As an example, the guy who Cheney shot would not have a tort claim against him, or would he simply have to wait until Cheney leaves office?
Both statute and decision (see, e.g., Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731) "The President's absolute immunity extends to all acts within the 'outer perimeter' of his duties of office." The Cheney incident is interesting. Arguably a quail hunt could be outside the the "outer perimeter" of official duties. Conversely, if there was any Executive Branch business being conducted during the time that they were hunting, then that would render the entire hunt official and "off limits." The decisions are construed by the courts with sufficient latitude to make just about anything that the Pres or VP do an "official duty," unless it's a criminal activity. And, then, Congress must still impeach before an indictment may move forward.
Brown is the new black Apr 12, 2006 by Ann Coulter This is the only country on Earth that thinks it's not sporting to consider our own interests in choosing immigrants. Try showing up in any other country on the planet, illiterate and penniless, and announcing: "I've seen pictures of your country and it looks great. I think I'd like to live here! Oh, and by the way, would you mind changing all your government and business phone messages, street signs and ballots into my native language? Thanks!" They would laugh you out of the country. What seems not to have occurred to the "NO HUMAN BEING IS ILLEGAL" crowd is that this is a country, not a public park. There are more than 6 billion people in the world, many of whom apparently like the idea of living in the wealthiest democracy on Earth. But if the billions of people of the world did live here, it wouldn't be "here" anymore. America is special for a reason that must transcend the right to vote -- or everyone would be trying to immigrate to Iraq right now. America has a seller's market in immigration, but thanks to Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration law, we no longer favor skilled workers from developed nations, but instead favor unskilled immigrants from the Third World. Kennedy's bill promptly cut the number of European immigrants in half and increased Third World immigrants to 85 percent of the total. Not surprisingly, post-1965 immigrants have sharply higher levels of poverty and welfare dependence. Europeans may not seem like ideal new immigrants, but the truth is, if what they want is welfare, they'll stay in France. It's as if we've got the last Xbox 360s available on Christmas Eve and instead of doubling the price, we're entertaining low-ball offers. Or more accurately, we're paying our customers to take the darn things off our hands -- and the customers are still indignant with us. On CNN's "Lou Dobbs Tonight" on Monday, Dobbs was interviewing Nativo Lopez, president of the Mexican-American Political Association about his demand for "full immediate, unconditional legalization for all persons currently in the United States." Dobbs posed this innocuous question about Lopez's planned boycott, "You're talking about a boycott of all illegal aliens in this country?" Lopez exploded: "Well, first off, I refute your terminology. You don't say 'kike,' 'patty,' 'WOP,' OK. You don't say "nigger"! ... You're using language that's offensive to me and offensive to my people! ... You pollute the air every day, Dobbs. ... That language is offensive, it's derogatory, it's denigrating, and don't use that terminology to me again, referring to my people!" Dobbs eventually ended Lopez's Tourette's episode by calmly asking him what he expected the impact of the boycott to be. An hour later on MSNBC's "Hardball," Dave Rodriguez, of the League of United Latin American Citizens, leapt in to denounce Rep. Tom Tancredo for using the word "amnesty." He said: "There isn't any such thing as amnesty in this law. I don't understand what this debate is. That's your own terminology on it ..." Bank robbers and drug dealers ought to start claiming that the words "bank robber" and "drug dealer" are akin to the N-word. They could accuse lawmakers of "criminalizing felonies" and claim they don't understand what the word "jailbreak" means. At the same time on CNN's "The Situation Room," Maria Elena Salinas, an anchor at Univision, was informing Wolf Blitzer that "all Hispanics feel offended by what has been going on, by the rhetoric, the level of the negativity that you hear coming out of Capitol Hill and also on some television stations and by some journalists." So it's really more like we've got the last Xbox 360s available on Christmas Eve and the customers are not only demanding money to take the hottest sales item off our hands, but are verbally abusing us and acting petulant. I'm offended that you would even think about asking me to pay for the Xbox 360! You say it has a "20 GB detachable hard drive"? Well, would you use the word "kike"? As hardworking as illegal immigrants are when they come here, they are immediately demagogued by liberals into adopting the victimhood pose so popular on college campuses. Everybody wants to act like his ancestors were brought here on slave ships. Consider this e-mail from Michele Waslin, La Raza's director of Immigration Policy Research, to her members denouncing Sen. Lamar Alexander's proposal to provide government grants to immigrants who want to learn English and American history and to organizations offering those courses. (I'd be happy with a law that simply trained new immigrants not to be "offended" all the time.) Even though this potentially meant free money for La Raza, Waslin -- of the Guadalajara Waslins -- ominously warned that while the amendment "doesn't overtly mention assimilation, it is very strong on the patriotism and traditional American values language in a way which is potentially dangerous to our communities." Meanwhile, Americans aren't allowed to consider whether millions of immigrants refusing to learn English and American history is "potentially dangerous to our communities." Here, please -- we'll pay you, just take the whole Xbox 360 factory.
Leave it to Ann Coulter to nail it. Is there another country on earth which has ever tolerated a colonizing invasion from a neighboring country? And name me one country with a large, unassimilated ethnic bloc from a neighboring country that didn't ultimately have terrible problems. You have to wonder about illegal immigrants who will risk everything to flee the terrible conditions in whatever latin american hell hole they come from , yet when they get here they want to try to recreate the same thing that ruined their old country. Plus, they are indignant that anyone would dare to suggest they do something to improve their chances, like maybe learn friggin' english. It's not enough that we ignore our own law and let them bankrupt our hospitals, dsestroy our schools and communities, WE are supposed to bend over backwards to accommodate their "culture", the same culture that produced the conditions they are fleeing. And our own President, a supposed conservative, calls those who are concerned vigilantes.
WE are supposed to bend over backwards to accommodate their "culture", the same culture that produced the conditions they are fleeing. Exactly, waving mexican flags yet doing everything possible to stay here. When sent to their shithole country they are back in a hurry. Where this pride comes from? Ignorance I guess. Huge political problem for the U.S.
The Democrats are whores. The Democrats are outsourcing for votes. Their whoring is now a global enterprise. They canât help themselves now. If our own nation offers no business, why not go south of the border?
Good thing we have a republican president, house, senate, and supreme court keeping all the illegals out during a time of war.... Rolling on the floor, pissing my pants at how ridiculous the situation is that republicans are somehow trying to blame the powerless democrats for the current situation.... I've never seen such a victim mentality from those who actually have the political power....and may well lose it by virtue of their own stupidity and massive degrees of hubris.