There was no Pandemic

Discussion in 'Politics' started by misterkel, Mar 8, 2025.

  1. So, if it's batshit crazy to believe the vaccines caused injury, why did the courts pay out this massive sum for vaccine injury?


    9ef938420c97213a2848c18d6897f1cf.png
     
    #41     Mar 12, 2025

  2. It is batshit crazy to claim every death or disease is caused by vaccines. The kid in the begining of this post did not die from a vaccine for example.

    There are cases where flu, measles, covid and other vaccines have caused side effects which are significant. Same with numerous other FDA approved drugs I might add. Highlihgting the tails of a distribution does not support a fact, it supports the exceptions.

    Look at the number of people who took the vaccine and hte number claiming an adverse side effect. If your position that nothing should be administrered with adverse side effects, please demonstrate that you have stopped taking every single medication ever prescribed to you.

    I fully state that vaccines should NOT have been mandatory as anti flu measures if followed should have been implemented for those who chose not to vax. But for nuts out there who did not want the vaccine, dont share your bullshit non medical opinions without factual basis.

    Showing me a person who had a serious side effect to the vaccine is like me showing you a person who nevcer got Covid after getting jabbed and claming the vax cured covid.
     
    #42     Mar 12, 2025
  3. https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/reuters-fake-fact-check-fails-again

    Reuters Fact Check falsely asserted, “The mRNA instructs cells to make the [spike] protein and is broken down by the body shortly thereafter” although the new study found “spike in circulation up to 709 days after vaccination.” When does Reuters Fact Check plan to correct this falsehood in accordance with what is reported in this new study?
    [​IMG]

    Reuters Fact Check asserted, “There is no proof that spike proteins created in response to mRNA vaccines are harmful to the body.” However, the new study reported:

    Interaction with full-length S, its subunits (S1, S2), and/or peptide fragments with host molecules may result in prolonged symptoms in certain individuals. Recently, a subset of non-classical monocytes has been shown to harbor S protein in patients with PVS. Further, biodistribution studies on mRNA–LNP platforms in animal models indicate its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, and the local S expression could result in neurocognitive symptoms.

    When does Reuters Fact Check plan to correct this falsehood in accordance with what is reported in this new study?

    [​IMG]



    I spoke for several hours on background with one of the paper's 28 authors, so who is Reuters Fact Check speaking with?

    Did you notice that each time I caught Reuters with a fake fact check, their mistakes always favored the pharmaceutical industry? Well, Reuters Fact Check never responded to me. Instead, Reuters posted a fake fact check that never bothered to quote anything I sent them. Nor did Reuters go back and correct their fake fact checks from the past. And their fake headline attacked something that was never claimed.

    Nobody I’m aware of, nor anyone I have spoken with thinks “Long COVID is a vaccine injury” as Reuters falsely contends. But with tens of millions of Americans reported to have Long COVID, some subset of these patients are likely vaccine injured.

    [​IMG]
    Reuters Fact Check simply made up a claim, debunked it, and proclaimed victory. This is exactly how another former Meta fact checker, Leadstories.com, behaved when they did a fake fact check of a BMJ investigation that exposed problems with Pfizer’s COVID clinical trial.

    I spoke to Dr. Danice Hertz, another of the study authors, to get her views on fake fact checks and why so many medical professionals have politicized the issue of vaccines. “Up until this moment, vaccine injury was not acknowledged,” Hertz told me. “And there’s been a concerted effort to cover it up.”

    A couple weeks after Zuckerberg cut ties in January with biased fact checkers like Reuters, he sat for an interview with Joe Rogan and complained that Meta was pressured to censor anything on vaccine side effects.

    “Who’s pressuring you take down things that talk about vaccine side effects,” Rogan asked.

    “It was people in the Biden administration,” Zuckerberg said.


    Note: An early version of this story misspelled the name of Kerryn Phelps as “Kellyn Phelps.”
     
    #43     Mar 12, 2025
  4. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    I took the J and J vaccine so I could go on a cruise. I viewed it as being much more safe than the Moderna and Pfizer ones.
     
    #44     Mar 12, 2025
    echopulse likes this.

  5. No - I do not, nor have I ever asserted such a bullshit STRAWMAN argument as this garbage I read just now. I have NEVER claimed every problem is caused by the jab. NEVER. NOT ONCE. ZERO TIMES.
    Nor do I claim that all medicines with any side effects should be banned.
    In fact, I've repeatedly asserted that the vaxxes should NOT be banned. Only fully disclosed. How people commit slowicide is none of my business.
    I despise this disgusting made up arguments pushed on me that I never said. It just disgusts me. You know full fucking well I never said that, yet you pretend I did.
    Grotesque. Farcical. Gutter Dwelling behavior.

    1. The risk should be proportional to the benefit. Many variables here, such as likelihood of risk and probability of benefit, plus extent of harms.
    2. NO medication should ever be coerced.
    3. Full disclosure of the risks.
    4. Actual testing by disinterested parties - not cronies paid by the pharma industry.
    5. All evidence should be publicly available - NOT withheld.
    6. Curative medication has a FAR higher risk allowance than prophylactic medication (vaccines).
    7. If the pharma / regulatory field is caught lying (and I do mean lying, not being mistaken), they should be prosecuted. If people died from their deceptions, the charge should be MASS MURDER.

    All of these principles were systematically, egregious, and multiply violated in the case of mRNA injections.
    Which ones do you disagree with?
     
    #45     Mar 12, 2025
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    -
    LOL. We have read all of your previous anti-vax posts plus all your posts providing debunked bullshiat from anti-vax Covid-deniers. It's laughable that you are trying to re-frame this now.
     
    #46     Mar 12, 2025
  7. Medical fraud is a real thing. I know people magically believe it no longer happens, but here is the story of the scientist who fooled the entire medical establishment for over a decade with the lie of amyloid plaques causing Alzheimers.
    EVERYBODY fell for it. And it set Alzheimer's research back and created masive suffering.


    https://forbetterscience.com/2022/07/27/silvain-lesne-is-a-failed-scientist/

    The same happened systematically with Covid and the vaccines.
    So - fools take it all you want.
    7 vaccines and you still got it.
    took a vaccine in a parking lot in exchange for a donut.
    Kind of stupid.
     
    #47     Mar 12, 2025
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Yes, medical fraud is a real thing. The biggest medical fraud artists in history are the anti-vax crowd that pushed hydroxy and ivermectin has cures for Covid while peddling these "cures" in online websites for personal gains. The anti-vax nonsense they shoveled coupled with the fake cures killed millions of people worldwide.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2025
    #48     Mar 12, 2025
  9. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Physician-finder-meme.jpg
     
    #49     Mar 12, 2025
  10. I didnt take 7 vaccines or get a donut as incentive to get a vax....

    As for fraud....simply believing what you read in an article is how dumb people get fooled. Do your research, talk to several doctors, use your brain.
     
    #50     Mar 12, 2025